Division of Labour: March 2008 Archives
March 30, 2008
Dental Economics

No, all economics isn't akin to a root canal. Dental economics seems to be an active niche for research. Our own Josh Hall has a forthcoming paper examining interstate variation in tooth loss. Now there's a new NBER WP "The Economic Value of Teeth". Coming soon to a journal near you--a dynamic GE model of cavities.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 04:11 PM in Economics

Mile-high rent seeking

How "unions which represent just 7 percent of Colorado's private workforce [threaten] to permanently encumber the state in exchange for a four-day party":

The four-day Democratic National Convention in August is expected to pump $160 million directly into the regional economy. The economic shot-in-the-arm, whatever the total actually ends up being, will be a welcome boost. But we're beginning to question whether the short-term benefit is worth the long-term expenses.

Denver, and Colorado, could be left holding the bag for years to come. Even before the Democrats awarded their national convention to Denver, Mayor John Hickenlooper had to promise a union-run hotel, the city's first. He delivered.

Then ... Denver cops received at least a 14 percent salary increase for the next three years. The contract nearly tripled the percentage raise handed out in the previous three-year contract.

[Next, Governor] Ritter delivered his Friday afternoon executive order, granting state workers unnecessary collective bargaining rights that will drive up the cost of state government.

The Service Employees International Union [promised to] strike during the DNC if it needs to. The union is concerned about which company may get the contract to manage parking at DIA. [...] Then we learned that three city councilmen, two with strong union ties, met privately with representatives of the union and one of the companies vying for the parking contract. Not only was the meeting in violation of Colorado's open meetings law, it raised questions about who those councilmen are working for: the union or Denverites?

Hickenlooper has promised that not a penny of taxpayer money would be spent on the convention. Yet it appears taxpayers could pay more indirectly for having the convention here.

Don't know where the $160 million number came from, but almost certainly some bogus "multiplier" has been applied and any displacement of other activities by the convention has been ignored.

Posted by Wilson Mixon at 01:40 PM in Economics

March 28, 2008
Pubs Ban British Treasury Chief After Alcohol Tax Hike
Earlier this month, treasury chief Alistair Darling raised taxes on cars and cigarettes, but it is his new alcohol duties — which raised the price of a pint of beer — that have gotten Britons' backs up.

So when a pub landlord in Darling's home town of Edinburgh barred the chancellor from his establishment, drinking holes across the country followed suit, posting pictures of the white-haired, bespectacled treasurer above the big red word "barred."

Bar manger Andrew Little at the Utopia pub, which kicked off the campaign, told The Associated Press the poster was put up "tongue-in-cheek," but the sentiment snowballed.

"It looks like we've touched a nerve," Little said.

Hundreds have joined Internet groups devoted to running Darling out of every pub in the country, and establishments from the Tap And Spile in the north England town of Lincoln to the Plough Inn in Finstock, near Oxford, said Darling would not allowed to partake of their booze.

Source here.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 09:49 AM in Misc.

The Secret to Making Poor Nations Rich

The Independent Institute's David Theroux informs me of this upcoming event:

I am delighted to alert you to an airing on C-SPAN2's "Book TV" of our recent event "The Secret to Making Poor Nations Rich" this Sunday, March 30 at 4:30 p.m. Eastern time, 1:30 pm Pacific, featuring Independent Institute fellows.


Benjamin Powell, Research Fellow, The Independent Institute and Assistant Professor of Economics, Suffolk University. Editor, Making Poor Nations Rich: Entrepreneurship and the Process of Economic Development.

Alvaro Vargas Llosa, Senior Fellow and Director, Center on Global Prosperity, The Independent Institute.

George B. N. Ayittey, Distinguished Economist in Residence, American University.

I'm currently running a highly successful undergraduate seminar based on the book and we've had visits from 5 of the contributors (Ben Powell, Scott Beaulier, Jim Dorn, Randy Holcombe, and Pete Boettke).

NB: Chapter 5 is the best chapter!

Posted by Robert Lawson at 08:49 AM in Economics

March 27, 2008
Cutting Taxes in GA

The Georgia General Assembly is considering three tax cut plans: eliminate the car tax, eliminate taxes on retirement income, and an across the board cut in income tax rates. I weigh in on the options in this article for the Georgia Public Policy Foundation.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 10:34 PM

What would Smith say?

I finished reading Skousen's "The Making of Modern Economics," and one of the underlying themes is how Adam Smith's promotion of prudence and thrift being economically beneficial was questioned by Keynes and others, who stressed the necessity of spending and, well, imprudence.

A new stage of the debate has begun with "Freegans." If you're a vegan, even a level 5 vegan (don't eat anything that casts a shadow; that's for Josh), you have nothing on Freegans, who find the very act of purchasing things, even food, distasteful. And, fret not, if you have access to a computer (whether bought or borrowed), you can get these handy tips:

Curious about Dumpster diving? Freegan.info keeps a city-by-city listing of prime Dumpster locations, from bakeries to bookstores. Large chain stores in wealthy neighborhoods are particularly prone to tossing edible foods, Nelson says.

Of course, the current "prime" locations will only maintain their monopoly positions for so long. Freegan.info's well-intended publicity will lead to these prime Dumpsters being liquidated more rapidly by other Freegans.

If you go, she advises, bring a friend (in case the lid closes on you) and wear gloves to protect your hands from glass and other sharp objects. Ask your local police department first whether it's OK -- some cities have criminalized Dumpster diving. Don't salvage things that need to be refrigerated or show traces of mold, and thoroughly wash any food you've taken from a Dumpster before consuming. It's also a good idea to conduct a smell test of any food you may take; if it smells bad, it probably is spoiled and should be avoided."

I don't have a lot of Dumpster experience, but are the lids that heavy that you need the buddy system? How does that conversation start? "Thanks for the tea, Rose. Are you busy tomorrow afternoon? Publix tosses out their rolls at 3:00 and I could use a hand."

Nelson says freeganism has nothing to do with income. She says many divers, herself included, have at least moderate incomes: "It's really about boycotting the consumerist system."

Hmm, doesn't freeganism depend on consumers to produce the trash/recycled food? Unless Barack or Hillary get elected, we haven't yet achieved a society where we can all live off of each other.

Posted by Tim Shaughnessy at 12:14 PM in Economics

Bailout mentality

The bailout mentality is becoming ingrained in people's beliefs (if it's not already). One prominent pundit articulates what many are thinking.

While complaints of unfairness can always be raised, government bailouts can generally be defended when the government's failure to act could have dire consequences on society or the nation's financial system, said William Galston, a former domestic policy adviser to President Clinton and now a senior fellow at Washington's Brookings Institution.

"Sometimes, you have to act in a very broad way, a way that's not very sensitive to the distinction between the innocent and the guilty, in order to bring about a broader public good. And then you sort it out later if you can," Galston said.

Article "More government bailouts may be on way".

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 11:11 AM in Economics

A Tale of Two Teachers

My good friend Dirk Mateer has an interesting article about his and his wife's non tenure-track faculty positions at Penn State. A taste:

This amounts to a sizeable paradigm shift from the idea of a faculty member who balances teaching, research, and departmental service, to a model based on employees who are specialists. By increasing the specialization and division of labor among the faculty, universities are transforming how the institution functions. Highly trained specialists now exist on two tracks. The research track offers the possibility of tenure while the teaching side has a growing pool of lecturers carving out rewarding positions that focus on instruction. The two models complement each other and allow faculty members to focus on their comparative advantage, either in the classroom or in research.
Posted by Robert Lawson at 07:20 AM in Economics

March 26, 2008
Rogoff on Zimbabwe's Hyperinflation

From this afternoon's "All Things Considered" on NPR; listen here.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 10:18 PM in Economics

What's the alternative?

I second Frank's kudos to Will Wilkinson's radio commentary identifying the central-planning problem with central banking. I only wish that Will had been given another few seconds to identify the institutional alternative to central banking ...

Posted by Lawrence H. White at 03:17 PM in Economics

Space Tourism II

Wired carries the AP story:

New Entry in Space Tourism Industry (By JOHN ANTCZAK Associated Press Writer) Mar 26, 2:03 PM EDT

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- A California aerospace company plans to enter the space tourism industry with a two-seat rocket ship capable of suborbital flights to altitudes more than 37 miles above the Earth. The Lynx, about the size of a small private plane, is expected to begin flying in 2010, according to developer Xcor Aerospace, which planned to release details of the design at a news conference Wednesday.


Xcor's announcement comes two months after aerospace designer Burt Rutan and billionaire Richard Branson unveiled a model of SpaceShipTwo, which is being built for Branson's Virgin Galactic space tourism company and may begin test flights this year.

Which will eventually be a very cool thing. But in the meantime, it's an excuse to not so randomly quote the second funniest movie ever, Airplane II: The Sequel.

[in a montage of news reports] Buffalo Anchorman: Our top story Tonight, Four-alarm fire rages through Downtown Buffalo. Also in the news, Lunar Shuttle heads for the Sun, and certain disaster. Tokyo Anchorman: Our top story Tonight, Four-alarm fire rages through Downtown Tokyo. Also in the news, American Lunar Mission locked in death struggle. Moscow Anchorman: [with a gun pointed to his head] A Four-alarm fire in Downtown Moscow clears way for a glorious new tractor factory. And on the lighter side of the news, Hundreds of Capitalists are soon to perish in Shuttle disaster.

honorable mention:

Steve McCroskey: Jacobs, I want to know absolutely everything that's happened up till now.
Jacobs: Well, let's see. First the earth cooled. And then the dinosaurs came, but they got too big and fat, so they all died and they turned into oil. And then the Arabs came and they bought Mercedes Benzes. And Prince Charles started wearing all of Lady Di's clothes. I couldn't believe it.

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 02:48 PM in Misc.

If it sounds too good to be true?

This slipped by my spam filter today. I thought the list of what the offer IS NOT would make an interesting principles of microeconomics discussion:

You are invited to take advantage of an amazing money making opportunity. This opportunity is unique, real, honest, and NOT A SCAM! This opportunity is also NOT:


There is no risk involved, so visit the site below to check it out:

Is the double negative intentional?

Also, can there be an economic return without any risk?

Posted by Craig Depken at 02:02 PM in Economics

A New TR?

Matt Welch on McCain and individualism:

Like many country-first, party-second military officers who began second careers in Washington, Mr. McCain is often mischaracterized as a politician without any identifiable ideology. But all of his actions can be seen as an attempt to use the federal government to restore your faith in ... the federal government. Once we all put our shoulder on the same wheel, there’s nothing this country can’t do.

[...] I, for one, would welcome President McCain’s unilateral wars on pork-barrel spending and waterboarding — but it’s treacherous territory for those of us who consider “the pursuit of happiness” as something best defined by individuals, not crusading presidents-to-be.

Posted by Wilson Mixon at 01:47 PM in Politics

Gravel 2008: All over the map

Former senator (D-Alaska) a gadfly Democratic presidential candidate Mike Gravel announced yesterday that he is joining the Libertarian Party and will be seeking its 2008 nomination for president. Fox News reports:

In an e-mail to supporters, Gravel, 77, wrote, “I look forward to advancing my presidential candidacy within the Libertarian Party, which is considerably closer to my values, my foreign policy views and my domestic views.”

The same report also notes, however:

Last month, Gravel endorsed Green Party presidential nominee Jesse Johnson. [According to a spokesman,] Gravel didn’t see any reason “why not” to offer his backing since “voting party line is not smart” and he agrees with Johnson’s message as well as the Green Party’s approach of “direct democracy, mobilizing at a grassroots level, working with people one-on-one and enabling citizen democracy.”

The LP national convention will be held in May. 14 announced candidates are already in contention for the nomination. Apart from Gravel, the only candidate I've heard of is ... wait, I haven't heard of any of them.

Posted by Lawrence H. White at 11:51 AM in Politics

"The Beatles and Economics"

That's the title of a little piece (.pdf) I wrote up on the ABBA to Zeppelin site for the Beloit College Magazine.

Posted by Joshua Hall at 11:08 AM in Economics

The Pork Barrel

This morning's Wall Street Journal had a fascinating front-page article on the plight of British pork producers. The article touched on a lot of things we have talked about and will talk about in econ 101.

It raises an interesting issue in dynamic cost-benefit analysis: everyone is poorer if British pork producers are able to obtain subsidies and other protections. At the same time, however, the British pork lobby has produced--albeit unintentionally, I presume--an excellent and entertaining suite of teaching tools that will improve the way economists teach about competitive markets and political economy. They've made it all available online, including the fantastic song "Stand By Your Ham," a parody of Tammy Wynette's "Stand By Your Man." The music video is here. Finally, the campaign is an excellent exercise in branding: after watching the video, I'm a tad dismayed that I can't find a way to order British ham and bacon online. Really finally, this illustrates the power of unintended consequences. The US decides to subsidize biofuel production, so grain prices go up. Feed prices increase, and a lot of British pig farmers find themselves on the brink of bankruptcy. And now we have "Stand by Your Ham."

An Econ 101 question: according to the website, the British pig industry is losing six pounds every second. If that's true, what should British pig farmers do?

Posted by Art Carden at 10:37 AM in Economics

Best Paragraph I Heard on the Radio This Morning

Will Wilkinson on "Marketplace":

The problem here isn't that the guy in charge [of the Fed] isn't smart enough. The problem is that there's a guy in charge at all. We've put a central planner at the beating heart of our market system, but we've known for decades that central planners rarely have the information they need, or the incentive to use it correctly.
Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 08:58 AM in Economics

Tax Freedom Day

This year it's April 23, three days sooner than last year. From this Yahoo news story.

Americans will have to work on average 74 days to cover federal taxes, and another 39 days to cover state and local taxes, the group said. Housing costs require 60 days of work, while health care requires 50 days and food 35 days, it said.

The report and cool graph are here.

Tax Freedom Day is the cow bell, but elsewhere the Tax Foundation does some very good work, and has for over 70 years now.

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 07:10 AM in Economics

March 25, 2008
Economists Who Run

I've started a Facebook group for "all economists (defined broadly to include public choice/political scientists, policy wonks, experts in finance, etc.) who like to run."

Posted by Robert Lawson at 06:52 PM in Economics

Houston, we have a development takings problem

Joy Ford is what textbooks in law and economics call a holdout problem. Owner of Country International Records, Ms. Ford is something of a Nashville institution, a card-carrying member of the old school music scene. So is her business property, pictured here. bilde.jpg

According to Sunday's Nashville Tenneseean [article here]

The Metro Development and Housing Agency, the arm of the city government that oversees urban redevelopment, has signed an agreement with the Houston-based Lionstone Group to buy Ford's property, then sell it to Lionstone at cost. Backed with the possibility of eminent domain, city officials hope to persuade Ford to sell and clear the way for Lionstone's $100 million plan for a two-building commercial and residential complex.

Here's a rendition of the proposed development.

Ms. Ford has turned down Lionstone's offer of $600,000. Her announced asking price is $12 million. The Tennesean quotes her as saying, "I told them, 'I don't want to sell my property, but if you really have to have this property … here's the price."

From an economics perspective, I can think of three important issues at play here. 1) public choice vs. property rights; 2) subjective value vs. opportunism; and 3) private vs. public development. See below the fold if you are interested. Thanks.

Read More »

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 11:53 AM in Economics

Mercedes Benz - Janis Joplin

I've got a new song lyric assignment up over at the Abba to Zeppelin site.

Oh Lord, won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz? My friends all drive Porsches, I must make amends.

Assignment: Janis Joplin wants a Mercedes Benz in order to keep up with her friends. Economist Robert Frank writes about how people seek status in a game of constantly trying to outdo each other. He has advocated highly progressive taxes in order to reduce the ability of people to seek status by earning more money than others. What do you think of this idea? Assuming people aren’t able to achieve high status by making a lot of money, what other means, good and bad, do you think people might choose to achieve status among their peers?

Posted by Robert Lawson at 09:47 AM in Economics

March 24, 2008
Candy Prohibitions ...

... work about as well as drug and alcohol prohibitions:

With candy sales banned on school campuses, sugar pushers are the latest trend at local schools. Backpacks are filled with Snickers and Twinkees for all sweet tooths willing to pay the price.

“It’s created a little underground economy, with businessmen selling everything from a pack of skittles to an energy drink,” said Jim Nason, principal at Hook Junior High School in Victorville.

This has become a lucrative business, Nason said, and those kids are walking around campus with upwards of $40 in their pockets and disrupting class to make a sale.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 10:21 AM in Economics

Another Bush Failure

From today's WSJ:

George Mason University's Mercatus Center reveals in a soon-to-be released study that every measure of regulatory activity is up in recent years -- agency staffing, budgets, pages of rule making and compliance costs. Those numbers contradict the stream of attacks against this Administration for "weakening" federal consumer and environmental protections.

Excluding homeland security regulations, the budgets of Uncle Sam's 50 largest agencies, such as the Federal Communications Commission and the Consumer Products Safety Commission, are up almost one-third since 2001. There are now some 200,000 full-time government employees writing and enforcing federal commandments.

Regulators get an especially twitchy trigger finger at the end of every Administration. Heritage analyst James Gattuso warns that "A catalog of new rules are already in the pipeline for 2008.

What a dismal eight years, not that Gore or Kerry would have been any better.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 09:36 AM in Economics

Steve Horwitz on Wal-Mart

Steve offers up more evidence for Wal-Mart's Nobel Peace Prize (he has an earlier post on Wal-Mart and the Nobel Peace Prize here). A good paragraph:

As you have probably seen on TV and elsewhere, in September 2006, Wal-Mart launched its $4 prescription program. Now, 18 months later, it reports that it has saved consumers over $1 billion (yes, billion) as a result of that program. That's $1 billion that poorer consumers have to spend elsewhere on the things they need (or that is reducing insurance costs and premiums), not to mention they can now buy prescriptions they might not have been able to afford before or not have to cut pills in half to save money. Moreover, that program prompted Wal-Mart's competition to create similar programs, the benefits of which can be placed on top of that $1 billion. For some strange reason, the major media didn't cover this story when Wal-Mart's press release went out last Friday.

Wal-Mart also plays a prominent role in Steve's superb Mercatus policy paper on lessons that can be learned from the private sector's response to Hurricane Katrina.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 09:28 AM in Economics

March 23, 2008
Home Schooling

An inside view of home schooling:

"[H]ome-schooling" is a misnomer, really. Most of it doesn't even take place at home, and the schooling has little in common with what goes on in school. [...] What home-schoolers most readily reflect are the virtues of the old American frontier settlement or the Amish barn-raising -- we co-operate in self-reliance. My wife and I have been teaching our children ourselves for more than 15 years, and we've found that home-schooling opens doors that schools leave closed.

And contrary to most popular belief, home-schooling isn't the brainchild of religious fanatics. It actually got started in the counterculture of the 1960s. [...] My wife and I hadn't originally planned on home-schooling, but with six children and one modest income, we couldn't afford a house in one of the better school districts in the state. We were living in Plainfield, an elegant old central New Jersey city with typically poor urban public schools characterized by bureaucratic mismanagement, low teacher morale and student violence. [...]

Home-schoolers also work across a much wider socioeconomic spectrum than the conventionally schooled. We have worked on many projects, and in many organizations, that draw participating home-schoolers from all around our state, from far beyond school district borders. [...]

The results? Studies have shown that home-schooled children outperform the conventionally schooled not only on standardized academic tests but also on tests of social skills. This, I believe, isn't because home-schoolers do things better than schools do them but because we do better things than schools do. [...]

Conventional schools are like the nation's Rust Belt companies, designed in the 19th century but struggling to meet the standards of international competition today. [...] People who are free to think for themselves usually get together and find solutions that are better than what bureaucrats can devise.

Posted by Wilson Mixon at 10:44 AM in Misc.

March 21, 2008
Brad DeLong's Morning Coffee

"Brad DeLong's Morning Coffee" on YouTube. Particularly interesting are his discussions of Karl Marx.

Posted by Art Carden at 09:11 AM in Economics

March 20, 2008
Education in Africa: Science and Entrepreneurship

Here's Neil Turok's talk on his entrepreneurial efforts in African education:

And here's Patrick Awuah, founder of Ashesi University, discussing his vision for liberal arts education in Ghana:

Posted by Art Carden at 01:07 PM in Economics

March 19, 2008
Investors cheer lending rate cut, but professor casts warning

So read the front page of today's local fishwrapper. Yours truly is said egghead and here are my comments about the Fed's rate cut yesterday:

There are strong indications, most notably the decreasing international value of the dollar and the rapid rise in prices of commodities such as oil and gold, that the Fed’s monetary policy is already overly inflationary. Today’s rate cut further exacerbates the likelihood of 1970s levels of inflation, inflation that carries more long-term harm than short-run gain for the economy.”

Debauching a currency is no way to make a country prosperous.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 03:11 PM in Economics

Chris Coyne at Rhodes, 3/24

After War author Christopher J. Coyne will speak at Rhodes on Monday, March 24 at 7:00 PM. More information can be found here. This will be the third of four speakers generously sponsored by the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation.

Posted by Art Carden at 10:07 AM

March 18, 2008
Fooled By the Randomness of March Madness

It's that time of year: March Madness. I've watched parts of two NCAA games this year (UT-Memphis and Duke-UNC), but that hasn't stopped me from joining James Hamilton's Econbrowser group at ESPN.com's Tournament Challenge or from creating a Division of Labour Group. The DoL is limited only by the extent of the market, so all are welcome.

Update: I'm told the DOL bracket link doesn't work. Here's the long way around. Register for an ESPN.com account and search the group directory for "Division of Labour."

Posted by Art Carden at 06:44 PM in Sports

March 17, 2008
This and That

I was in DC over the weekend for an excellent IHS workshop on "Liberty and the Art of Teaching." A couple of quick observations about Julian Simon, iPods, and commerce are below the fold.

Read More »

Posted by Art Carden at 10:53 AM in Misc.  ·  Comments (2)

Friedman made my car not start today!

Paul Krugman's screed (dated last year) actually blames Milton Friedman for food poisoning. Seriously, I quote,

That’s why I blame the food safety crisis on Milton Friedman, who called for the abolition of both the food and the drug sides of the F.D.A.

No doubt like thousand of other Americans, I woke up to a dead battery in my car today. That damned Friedman! I mean if it weren't for wild-eyed libertarians like him, we'd have a federal dead battery protection agency (FDBPA) to stop this dead battery crisis in its tracks. I mean were talking about thousand of dead batteries every day! Oh the humanity!

Posted by Robert Lawson at 10:31 AM in Economics

March 16, 2008
Booster Socialism

George Will has (apparently) coined a nifty term for corporate welfare. An example:

For example, suburban Scottsdale's City Council has given $1.5 million for 19 automobile dealerships -- some of them owned by companies with revenues in the billions -- to spend on marketing.
Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 06:07 PM in Economics

March 14, 2008
Eliot Spitzer Night at the Ballpark

You knew this was coming:

The Macon Music announced today that the team will host “Eliot Spitzer” Night on Friday, June 13th 2008 when the Music play host to the Aiken Foxhounds.

During “Eliot Spitzer” Night, the following elements will exist:

1. The Music have extended an invitation for former New York Governor Spitzer to be on hand and throw out the first pitch
2. The team will give away a New York Vacation including a one night stay at the MayFlower Hotel
3. Client #9 (or fan #9) will receive a free Music prize pack
4. Any fan with the name Eliot, Spitzer, or “Kristen” along with any fan from New York will receive $1 off admission
5. The Music will play Frank Sinatra music throughout the evening in honor of New York
6. Wire Taps will be placed throughout the ballpark this evening
7. ATMs will be available for cash withdrawals not to exceed $5,000 per hour
8. Any fan who has resigned their position will be given $1 off admission
9. The 871 fan will receive a gift certificate for the Macon Music Team store.

Here and here are previous examples of wacky promos.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 08:16 PM in Sports

Anthony Downs was on to something

In the U.S., third parties and anti-establishment folks groan about the two-party dominance that is American politics. Today's Iranian elections provide a little perspective. Reuters has the full story here. A few key excerpts.

By Zahra Hosseinian and Parisa Hafezi

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iranians voted on Friday in a low-key election likely to keep parliament in the grip of conservatives after unelected state bodies barred many reformist foes of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from the race.


Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has effectively endorsed Ahmadinejad and his government, cast his ballot early and urged others to do the same.

Khamenei usually stays above the political fray, but he was quoted as saying in newspapers on Thursday that Iranians should consider "voting for those who can pave the way for the current government which is active and willing to serve".

His support for Ahmadinejad was relayed by anonymous text messages to mobile phone users on Friday.

Shrugging off reformists' complaints that the system was stacked against them, Ahmadinejad said after voting: "Our revolution means the presence of people ... Parliament belongs to people and it should be a reflection of what they want."


The president can rely on loyalists like Hassan Siavashi, 45. "It is my religious duty to vote. I pray God will help Ahmadinejad's group to win," he said before voting in Tehran.

Bibi Zahra, an elderly woman in a black chador, said she had put her trust in her son's choice. "I don't know who I was voting for, he filled in the form for me," she added.


When this much makes it into the press, you know it's only the tip of the iceberg. Without meaningful political competition, democracy collapses toward autocracy.

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 11:57 AM in Politics

Kudos to Mike Munger ...

... for getting to participate in the North Carolina gubernatorial debate in October (he's the Libertarian candidate). The debate will be held in Charlotte--maybe Craig can live blog it for us.

Looking for some supreme swag--then donate to Mike's campaign. Logo t-shirts, collector's quality coffee mugs, and more--all for a modest donation. It's the best $50 I've spent today ...

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 11:45 AM in Politics

Sunday Beer Sales and Baseball Attendance

The GA legislature is currently considering a bill that would allow the Gwinnett Braves (the relocated Richmond Braves) to sell beer at their stadium on Sundays. Unlike Sunday sales for the Rome Braves which were allowed by a city referendum in 2004, the Gwinnett matter must go before the legislature because its stadium is in an uncorporated area rather than a city. If the legislature doesn't approve Sunday sales the Braves apparently have the right to renegotiate or even pull out of their commitment to move to Gwinnett in 2009. More background here.

The legislative kerfuffle over Sunday beer for Gwinnett brought to mind my recent IJSF paper (with math colleague Ron Taylor and former student Andrew Chupp). Rome's 2004 referendum created a natural experiment for us to assess the effect of alcohol availability on attendance. We compared the Rome Braves 2003 and 2004 Sunday attendance (before beer sales were allowed) to their 2005-2006 Sunday attendance when beer was available. (We controlled for lots of other factors that might influence attendance--promotions, rehab appearances by Chipper Jones, ...) We found that allowing Sunday sales resulted in a small (2%) and statistically insignificant increase in attendance. Attendance does seem to be influenced by cheap beer--the team offers two for one beverages on Thursdays and draws about 8% more fans than on other weeknights. While Rome's experience may not carry over to other communities, our paper does call into question the conventional wisdom about beer and attendance.

A footnote: In the Gwinnett Daily Post article linked above, Georgia's mercantilist Gov. Sonny Perdue refers to the Gwinnett stadium as an "economic development project." Hey guv--saying it's so, doesn't make it so.

ADDENDUM: I left something out of the initial post. Even if beer sales have a weak effect on attendance, they can be an important source of revenue for teams. Using some information on the amount of beer taxes the Rome Braves paid to the city of Rome, my co-authors and I did some back of the envelope calculations and estimated the team gets an additional $40,000 or so per year in beer revenue from Sunday sales. A correspondent indicates that a large professional event can draw $1m in concession revenue with half being attributable to beer.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 10:19 AM in Economics

March 13, 2008
Elephant Vasectomies, Who Knew?
After a successful trip to Southern Africa in 2006 to control its growing elephant population, a team of veterinary experts led by Disney's Animal Kingdom have returned to the area for 10 days to perform laparoscopic vasectomies on six to 10 bull elephants in the Songimvelo Reserve in the Mpumalanga Parks Region, Africa until August 3, 2007. The surgical procedure proved to be productive last July when the Disney team and other animal experts performed the same procedure on four male elephants at the Welgevonden Game Reserve in South Africa.

A bit of puzzle here--these places probably have private property rights in elephants, but why don't they use trophy hunters to control the population?

HT: Melissa Yeoh

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 07:40 PM in Economics


At the Public Choice Society meetings last weekend, I had an interesting chat with Francisco Rodriguez, former Chief Economist of the Venezuelan National Assembly and currently Assistant Professor of Economics and Latin American Studies at Wesleyan University (which just hired my grad school friend Pao-Lin Tien). We discussed Hugo Chavez, and he sent me his recent contribution to Foreign Affairs. The punchline: Hugo Chavez isn't good for Venezuela's poor. In Rodriguez's words:

Neither official statistics nor independent estimates show any evidence that Chavez has reoriented state priorities to benefit the poor. Most health and human development indicators have shown no significant improvement beyond that which is normal in the midst of an oil boom. Indeed, some have deteriorated worryingly, and official estimates that income inequality has increased. The "Chavez is good for the poor" hypothesis is inconsistent with the facts.


Posted by Art Carden at 06:09 PM

Overlooking the Obvious Question

My former student Dan Alban points me to a WaPo article on sidewalk food vendors in DC. Apparently a long time wholesale supplier of vendors is facing some new competiton from Zipcar entrepreneur Gabe Klein. The article details the back and forth between WG, a firm that has held a large share of the market for years, and Klein. While it is amusing to know that WG's owners refer to Klein as the backpack guy and Klein refers to WG as the hot dog guys (because their carts peddle hot dogs instead of more modern fare such as hummus) the article completely misses an obvious question--why has WG held such a large market share for so many years? Could it be that, just maybe, there are some provisions in DC's complicated regulartory regime that created frankfurter monopoly? That's my bet, but the article contains only the vaguest hints.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 02:40 PM in Economics

Home schooling news

My trolling of Catholic blogs brought up two stories I'm guessing are of interest to DoL readers (who are probably Friedman fans, himself a staunch supporter of more choices in education). First, Jimmy Akin directs to this story about a California state appelate court case on the credentials of home-schooling parents:

"Parents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children," wrote Justice H. Walter Croskey in a Feb. 28 opinion signed by the two other members of the district court.

A second post by Carl Olson points to an opinion piece in the Manila Standard Today:

The inevitable question is whether it is in the best interest of the child to be insulated from beliefs, ideas and values outside of what his parents allow. To say it more accurately, should the state stand by and allow children to be raised in accordance with their parents‘ biases and prejudices? Or does the state, in accordance with its own right to preserve itself, have the right to intervene, even to the point of infringing on parental authority, in order to provide the child with a more holistic view of the world and humanity?

Call me a conspiracy nut, but is it that hard to believe that, perhaps, parents who hold dissenting views on human-caused global warming, the benefits of redistribution programs, political correctness, or heck, even the logic of Social Security, might be deemed unfit to teach their children outside of state supervision? I take a medium-size tinfoil hat, please.

Posted by Tim Shaughnessy at 12:11 AM in Politics

March 12, 2008
"Interesting" piece on GMU econ

Doublethink, from America's Future Foundation, has an "interesting" feature based on interviews with GMU economists (article here). The writer is a Dartmouth student.

At an Asian noodle joint in Fairfax, I asked faculty member Alex Tabarrok what he meant by “interesting,” to which he replied, “Initial surprise, followed by obviousness.” [...] I asked Tabarrok if GMU wanted to engage the world out of an impulse toward public service. He agreed but added that “we’re also honestly interested in the stuff we do with it. There’s a certain freedom that comes with setting aside other people’s ideas of what you’re supposed to do and just doing what seems interesting. You accept a little dissing, I guess.”

Other interviewees include Robin Hanson, Bryan Caplan, Ilia Rainer, Pete Leeson, Arnold Kling, Tyler Cowen.

As a rule, great film directors are far, far better at directing films than they are at giving interviews. There is some carry over here. But if you find the GMU approach...well...interesting, then it's a worthwhile read.

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 05:48 PM in Economics

Brain-dead Statist

Interesting article, especially given the author's identity. Its title is "Why I Am No Longer a 'Brain-Dead Liberal,'" but Gary Roseman says I must use the word Statist.

I wrote a play about politics, ... [a]nd as part of the "writing process," as I believe it's called, I started thinking about politics, ... which is to say, about the polemic between persons of two opposing views. The argument in my play is between a president who is self-interested, corrupt, suborned, and realistic, and his leftish, lesbian, utopian-socialist speechwriter.

The play, ... a disputation between reason and faith, or perhaps between the conservative (or tragic) view and the liberal (or perfectionist) view. The conservative president in the piece holds that people are each out to make a living, and the best way for government to facilitate that is to stay out of the way, as the inevitable abuses and failures of this system (free-market economics) are less than those of government intervention.

I took the liberal view for many decades, but I believe I have changed my mind. ...

As a child of the '60s, I accepted as an article of faith that government is corrupt, that business is exploitative, and that people are generally good at heart. This is, to me, the synthesis of this worldview with which I now found myself disenchanted: that everything is always wrong.

But in my life, a brief review revealed, everything was not always wrong, and neither was nor is always wrong in the community in which I live, or in my country. Further, it was not always wrong in previous communities in which I lived, and among the various and mobile classes of which I was at various times a part. ...

I'd observed that lust, greed, envy, sloth, and their pals are giving the world a good run for its money, but that nonetheless, people in general seem to get from day to day; and that we in the United States get from day to day under rather wonderful and privileged circumstances—that we are not and never have been the villains that some of the world and some of our citizens make us out to be, but that we are a confection of normal (greedy, lustful, duplicitous, corrupt, inspired—in short, human) individuals living under a spectacularly effective compact called the Constitution, and lucky to get it.

So, taking the tragic view, the question was not "Is everything perfect?" but "How could it be better, at what cost, and according to whose definition?" Put into which form, things appeared to me to be unfolding pretty well.

What about the role of government? Well, in the abstract, coming from my time and background, I thought it was a rather good thing, but tallying up the ledger in those things which affect me and in those things I observe, I am hard-pressed to see an instance where the intervention of the government led to much beyond sorrow.

But if the government is not to intervene, how will we, mere human beings, work it all out? I wondered and read, and it occurred to me that I knew the answer, and here it is: We just seem to.

Do I speak as a member of the "privileged class"? If you will—but classes in the United States are mobile, not static, which is the Marxist view. That is: Immigrants came and continue to come here penniless and can (and do) become rich; the nerd makes a trillion dollars; the single mother, penniless and ignorant of English, sends her two sons to college (my grandmother). ...

And I realized that the time had come for me to avow my participation in that America in which I chose to live, and that that country was not a schoolroom teaching values, but a marketplace.

"Aha," you will say, and you are right. I began reading not only the economics of Thomas Sowell (our greatest contemporary philosopher) but Milton Friedman, Paul Johnson, and Shelby Steele, and a host of conservative writers, and found that I agreed with them: a free-market understanding of the world meshes more perfectly with my experience than that idealistic vision I called liberalism.

Posted by Wilson Mixon at 03:14 PM in Politics

NPR Piece on Financial Privacy

Yesterday Larry pointed out that the way Spitzer was busted reveals how little financial privacy we have. This morning NPR had a story on how banks monitor customer activity and notify the police if they think a person's financial transactions are suspicious.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 02:13 PM in Economics

Another Nanny State Republican

Yet another example of why I'm a libertarian:

A proposed law currently making its way through the Florida legislature ... would be a mandate that all eating establishment must have enough toilet paper when you go into the restroom.

The only problem is the bill doesn't dictate how much toilet paper is "enough."

State Senator Victor Crist, a Republican from Tampa, felt the problem was so important, a law must be passed to protect the backsides of anyone in Florida.

Story here. Below is Sheryl Crow's idea of how much is enough--I wonder if she'll be testifying before the Florida legislature.

One of my favorites is in the area of forest conservation which we heavily rely on for oxygen. I propose a limitation be put on how many squares of toilet paper can be used in any one sitting. Now, I don't want to rob any law-abiding American of his or her God-given rights, but I think we are an industrious enough people that we can make it work with only one square per restroom visit, except, of course, on those pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required.
Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 02:08 PM

March 11, 2008
Krugman on Interstellar Trade

I forget where I was reading recently about the possibility of interplanetary/intergalactic trade, but this essay by Paul Krugman on the theory of interstellar trade got my attention, especially since Mike Hammock and I are leading a discussion of the economics of Star Wars this evening. The first link goes to the blog post, the second to the paper (HT: Paul Krugman).

Posted by Art Carden at 05:00 PM

"The retirement savings of millions are meanwhile gradually being confiscated."

[Addendum: via email Frank notes the connection to Bryan Caplan's nice post comparing Rothbard to mainstream on inflation. In short, the Fed doesn't control inflation, it creates inflation.]

That's Gerry O'Driscoll in yesterday's Opinion Journal (article here, HT: Richard Reinsch).

With a deft insider hand and historical perspective, Gerry deconstructs the Fed's use of core inflation and grimly highlights the dangers of lagging indicators.

The Federal Reserve now confronts a serious economic problem with limited scope for action. Asset prices, especially those linked to housing, are falling. Financial institutions are capital-constrained and risk-averse, and are not lending. Economic growth is flagging. The classic response would be first to reflate the banking system and then the economy. But current inflation is rising. Excess money creation will translate quickly into even higher inflation.

Yet Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has in recent days promised further interest-rate cuts and monetary largesse. San Francisco Fed President Janet Yellen promised the Fed will tighten later at the right moment -- easier said than done. Charles Plosser, Philadelphia Fed president, was closer to the mark when he recently said "once the public loses confidence in the Fed's commitment to price stability, it is very costly to the economy for the Fed to regain that confidence."

The Fed needs to return to its mandate of controlling inflation. The first step is for the Fed to shed an inflation measure that misleads itself, other policy makers, and the markets. We do not need a rerun of the 1970s. Once is enough.

Gerry's outlook is a bit dramatic, in my opinion (for effect probably). Still, the policy message is spot on. Every macroeconomics student should read this piece of commentary.

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 01:49 PM in Economics

Rich, beautiful, shameless

Malcolm Forbes is supposed to have said, "Nepotism's OK as long as it's kept in the family." In that vein, NPR's "Steve Inskeep talks to [Scott] Simon, host of [NPR's] Weekend Edition Saturday, about his book, about growing up in Chicago and about the simultaneously selfless — and self-absorbed — enterprise of politics."

On the last point, Simon approvingly quotes his principal character: "Of course, the system isn't fair. It favors the rich, and the beautiful, and the shameless. But everyone gets a chance in the end."

That bit of praise sounds like a succinct statement the condemnation that statists use when calling for "regulation" of markets. Doesn't it occur to them that, given the levers available in both the market and the political system, the rich, the beautiful, and shameless are even more likely to prosper than if "regulation" were absent?

Posted by Wilson Mixon at 01:27 PM in Politics

Happy 400th to John Milton

By email from Emilio Pacheco, COO of Liberty Fund:

John Milton born in 1608 is celebrated in two exhibitions, at the Bodleian Library at Oxford University, and the University of Cambridge Library. The links below will take you to the websites for these exhibitions.



The latter has a series of worthwhile yet breezy essays on Milton's influences. The little section on Milton's and today's pop culture is interesting. I found a nice connection to one of my favorite novels and novelists:

Several modern novelists have also drawn a lot of inspiration from Milton's work. Pullman aside, the poet has also deeply inspired the American novelist Paul Auster, whose postmodern New York Trilogy (1985-86), picks up several Miltonic themes including the nature of Paradise and the relationship between words and things (both works are haunted by the idea of a perfect language).

I first read Paradise Lost in its entirety for a Liberty Fund conference. A conference on Milton and Auster would be a good one. Hmmmm....

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 01:01 PM in Culture

The sobering side of the Eliot Spitzer story

It’s always good sport to see an anti-capitalist moral crusader brought down by a capitalist act between consenting adults. But the buzzkill in the Eliot Spitzer case is what the way he was caught reveals about how little financial privacy we have left. Spitzer’s large cash withdrawals to pay high-priced hookers were apparently flagged as “suspicious,” leading to the wiretaps that snared him.

Posted by Lawrence H. White at 12:49 PM in Economics

A Coasean Solution for Crummy Schools?
Critics who say unions block education reforms and make it virtually impossible to fire bad teachers will offer 10 instructors it deems the nation's worst $10,000 to quit their careers.

The Center for Union Facts, a Washington-based nonprofit, will launch a campaign Tuesday spending $1 million on ads and a billboard in New York's Times Square. It also says it's starting a Web site with data documenting how far unions go to protect bad teachers.

It's also inviting nominations for a contest to determine the nation's worst unionized teachers. The "winners" will be offered $10,000 each if they permanently resign or retire from any career in education — if they sign a release agreeing to have their name and the reasons for their selection published by the group.

Story here.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 09:02 AM in Economics

March 10, 2008
Berry Bikes on Capitol Hill?
Dubbed “Wheels4Wellness,” the new program will initially place 30 bikes at three locations around the U.S. House offices on Capitol Hill and will be available for free to the House’s 7,000 DC-based employees. Beard also announced that a second phase of the program will extend the locations to major transit hubs, like the train station at L’Enfant Plaza which is a popular hub for Capitol Hill commuters.

The details of the program are still being worked out. After the announcement Beard told me they’re still trying to decide the exact type of system they’ll use to access and return the bikes. Beard said he hopes the system can be integrated with an existing “QuickPay” payment card used for meals and other items on Capitol Hill that all employees already have.

Source here. The check out system means the program will likely have more success than open access bike programs like the Berry Bikes.

HT: Shawn Regan

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 04:07 PM in Economics

Administrators know demand curves are downward sloping?

Often it seems that academic administrators (among many other groups) are adamant that demand curves are not downward sloping or, at the very least, the price elasticity of demand is very small. Yet, it seems this is not true:

So starting this year it is trying something different to lure applicants: participating in a regional program resulting in lower tuition for students from Washington, Oregon, Montana and a dozen other Western states.

More in this interesting article. Another graph I found interesting:

University officials acknowledge that their use of pricing to attract out-of-state students is a break from the past. “This is a very unique philosophical shift,” said Don Betz, chancellor of the University of Wisconsin-River Falls.

The "unique philosophical shift" is only for a certain group of people. Raising tuition rates seems to be a knee-jerk reaction to a threatened or actual decline in university-wide revenues. However, every principles of microeconomics textbook provides a chapter on price elasticity of demand which explains that if price elasticity is greater than one in absolute value, raising price will reduce total revenues.

Whether the price elasticity of demand for smaller regional schools has been changing over time or if it is only now being recognized or intuited as being relatively high is an interesting question.

Posted by Craig Depken at 11:00 AM in Economics

March 08, 2008
The Greenwood Lake Philosopher c. 1908

From the March 8, 1908 NYT:

  • Time is money, but we can't pay our debts with it.
  • We wouldn't mind the unexpected if it didn't happen so often.
  • A sermon is sometimes based upon a text, and sometimes upon a pretext.
  • Posted by Craig Depken at 03:28 PM in Culture

    March 07, 2008
    On Cherokees and Former Slaves

    The Atlantic summarizes an interesting paper by University of Michigan doctoral student Melinda Miller. Based on The Atlantic's summary (not the article which I have not read in its entirety), I have a couple of questions.

    First, the summary states:

    In a new paper, a University of Michigan economist examines the fortunes of slaves freed after the Civil War by the Cherokee Nation. As Cherokee citizens, these freedmen were granted the right to “claim and improve any unused land in the Nation’s public domain.” Analyzing farm data from 1880, 15 years after emancipation, the paper finds that a black freedman in a Cherokee community was five times as likely to be a landowner as the typical African American in the former Confederacy. The average black Cherokee man owned livestock worth 80 to 90 percent as much as the livestock of a nonblack Cherokee citizen, whereas the typical Southern black’s livestock was worth only 45 to 60 percent as much as the livestock of the average white man.

    While these figures do suggest that freedmen did better in Cherokee communities, couldn't the differences be attributable to different denominators rather than different numerators? For example, the 80-90% vs 45-60% bit about livestock holdings in the last sentence could result from differences in livestock holdings of Cherokee citizens compared to white men rather than differences in how freedmen fared in the two environments.

    Second, the summary states:

    And the data suggest that Cherokee blacks were more likely to make savvy long-term investments: in 1880, 60 percent of Cherokee freedmen farmers had planted peach and apple trees (which take three to seven years to bear fruit), compared with only 5 percent of black landowners in the South. This evidence, the author concludes, vindicates General O. O. Howard, the superintendent of the Freedmen’s Bureau, who claimed that “more might have been done to develop the industry and energy of the colored race if I had been able to furnish each family with a small tract of land to till for themselves.”

    There's at least one other interpretation. It might be the institutional environment (security of property rights, equal treatment before the law) rather than land endowment per se that caused freedmen in Cherokee communities to be more likely to plant fruit trees than other blacks. Giving freed slaves free land might not have led to great fruit tree planting if they thought the Jim Crow hostility was such that they would be unlikely to enjoy (ahem) the fruits of their investment.

    Two related works come to mind: Co-blogger Art's work on lynching and the rule of law and this paper on land titling in an Argentine squatter community.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 01:40 PM in Economics

    On labor supply c. 1908

    From the March 7, 1908 NYT:

    MONTCLAIR, N.J. - James Reysons of West Orange, who was arrested here to-day as a mendicant, has solved, to his own satisfaction at least, the problem of economics relating to the amount of wages the individual should earn.

    Reysons was arrested at 9 o'clock and immediately arraigned before Recorder Yost. Chief of Police Harry Gallagher examined him.

    "How much do you earn a day begging?" he asked.

    "Twenty-five cents," said Reysons.

    "What had you collected when you were arrested just now?" inquired the Chief.

    "Fifteen cents," responded the prisoner.

    "What!" exclaimed the Chief. "You've made 15 cents at 9 o'clock and you don't get more than 10 cents the rest of the day?"

    "Well," said Reysons, with a tired look, "I quit work when I get the 25 cents."

    Reyson's response highlights the Chief's obvious mistake in confusing an individual's equilibrium level of begging and the revenue maximizing level of begging. The former recognizes both costs and "benefits" from begging whereas the latter recognizes only the "benefits." Most likely the two levels are different for most people, just as Reysons indicates.

    The story finishes by pointing out that Reysons was discharged upon "promising to leave town in five minutes." Five minutes!?! How fast could Reysons run?

    Posted by Craig Depken at 11:18 AM in Economics

    While Haitians Eat Dirt ...

    ... containers of food rot in Haitian ports. Why? Because:

    While millions of Haitians go hungry, containers full of food are stacking up in the nation's ports because of government red tape - leaving tons of beans, rice and other staples to rot under a sweltering sun or be devoured by vermin.

    A government attempt to clean up a corrupt port system that has helped make Haiti a major conduit for Colombian cocaine has added new layers of bureaucracy - and led to backlogs so severe they are being felt 600 miles away in Miami, where cargo shipments to Haiti have ground almost to a standstill.

    The problems are depriving desperate people of donated food. Some are so poor they are forced to eat cookies made of dirt, salt and vegetable oil to satisfy their hunger.

    An Associated Press investigation found the situation is most severe in Cap-Haitien, Haiti's second-largest city. One recent afternoon, garbage men shoveled a pile of rotting pinto beans that had turned gray and crumbled to dust as cockroaches and beetles scurried about.

    The men had found the putrid cargo by following a stench through stacked shipping containers to one holding 40,000 pounds of beans. It had been in port since November.

    The article contains lots more, though it will likely make you angry.

    BTW, Haiti ranks a miserable 101 out of 141 countries in Economic Freedom of the World rankings.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 12:14 AM in Economics

    March 06, 2008
    A Quibble with ...

    ... this part of Allen Sanderson's essay on incentives:

    For example, given that the Chicago Bears can sell out Soldier Field constantly, and the National Football League (NFL) shares its television revenues equally across members of the cartel, it is not surprising that the owner of the Bears is willing to do without a costly high-quality quarterback—payroll would rise but any effect on revenues would be shared with all the other teams.

    True enough, but what if a better quarterback (which means almost anyone since the imcumbent is Rex Grossman) allowed the Bears to charge higher ticket prices while selling out Soldier Field? This source indicates that stadium "gate" revenue is spilt 60-40 between the home and visiting teams, respectively. Thus, even a team could reap a large, though not complete, share of revenue generated by a QB upgrade.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 11:28 AM in Economics ~ in Sports

    George Will Channels Hayek

    A snip (with emphasis added by me) from Will's splendid column on Castro:

    Communism of any stripe is afflicted by terminal ignorance. Having no market, which is an information-generating mechanism, communism cannot know what things should cost.

    Hence communism's amazing contribution to humanity's economic history is "value-subtraction" -- products worth less than the materials that go into them. That result is seriously inconvenient for Marxism's labor theory of value -- the theory that labor adds all value to the world's materials.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 09:46 AM in Economics

    March 05, 2008
    Building Brand Equity: Memphis Entrepreneurs

    My articles on Fred Smith (FedEx) and Pitt Hyde (AutoZone) are now online.

    Posted by Art Carden at 04:18 PM in Economics

    School disasters c. 1908

    On March 4, 1908 in Cleveland, Ohio, a fire at Lake View school in Collinwood killed 165 children and 2 teachers (one died while guiding some children to fire escapes). The entire student population was 310 children, thus more than half died in the fire.

    The story unfolds much like we have come to expect. The fire started in the basement from an unknown source (perhaps arson), the fire gong was sounded but everyone acted as if it were only a drill. Thus, only those on the first of three floors were able to get out of the building in time. It is claimed that the doors opened inward and therefore the press of panicked students from the upper floors precluded opening the doors.

    All drills had used the front door as the primary exit, but the front door was inaccessible by the time the kids from the upper floors reached the first floor. This, in turn, made progress to the back door of the school somewhat chaotic. Then, it turns out the rear door was locked. Those children who made it to the bottom of the stairs tried to return to the upper floors but were met with more students coming down the stairs. The article points out "[w]hat happened at the foot of that first flight of stairs will never be knwn...[a]fter the flames had died away, however, a huge heap of little bodies, burned by the fire and trampled into things of horror, told the tale."

    The paper provides a list of those children who had been identified. In total, they listed 120 of which 100 had ages reported. Here are the descriptive statistics and a histogram:

        Variable |       Obs        Mean    Std. Dev.       Min        Max
              age |       100        9.97    2.341781          6         15

    Thank goodness these type of events are incredibly rare.

    Wikipedia Entry (with pictures) here: The Wikipedia entry reports that the doors didn't open inward. The original NYT article suggests that the building was designed with doors that opened outward but that it was not clear how the doors had been installed.

    Posted by Craig Depken at 03:57 PM in Culture

    Baptists and Bootleggers

    It will be interesting to see how this goes down: "the Tennessee Grocers and Convenience Store Association today launched its own statewide push for legislation allowing wine sales in food stores in the state." As I read the article, the legislation would still require licensing and multiple levels of government approval, leaving ample room for rent-seeking. This quote was revealing:

    "For years in Tennessee, the state’s politically powerful liquor wholesalers and retailers associations have blocked legislative efforts for grocery store wine sales. When the bill failed last year, the wholesalers’ veteran lobbyist, Tom Hensley of Jackson sat on the front row of the Senate committee and after the bill failed to elicit a motion for approval, he told reporters, 'If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.'"

    Posted by Art Carden at 02:46 PM

    March 04, 2008
    A Thomas Sowell Professorship

    Who knew?

    Update: More info here and here.

    Posted by Joshua Hall at 09:40 PM in Economics

    March 01, 2008
    Buckley's "Ultimate Resources"

    From Rich Lowry's appreciation:

    Back in 1959, Buckley excoriated the flabbiness of thought that attended an invitation to Nikita Khrushchev to visit the United States. He concluded: "Khrushchev cannot take permanent advantage of our temporary disadvantage, for it is the West he is fighting. And in the West there lie, however encysted, the ultimate resources, which are moral in nature. In the end, we will bury him." Throughout the decades, with his intellectual pickax, Buckley uncovered those ultimate resources.

    Posted by Wilson Mixon at 02:03 PM in Misc.

    What Hayek said during the 1970s, re-emphasized for the benefit of a forgetful Fed

    Allan H. Meltzer in the Wall St. Journal:

    A country that will not accept the possibility of a small recession will end up having a big one when the politicians at last respond to the public's complaints about inflation. Instead of paying the relatively small cost of a possible recession, the public pays the much larger cost of sustained inflation and a deeper recession. And enduring the deeper recession is the only way to convince the public that the Fed has at last decided to slow inflation.

    Hat tip: Bayesian Heresy

    Posted by Lawrence H. White at 11:34 AM in Economics

    Business/Economic Reporting

    Among the "Four Wrong Reasons for Pessimism":

    Want to know the truth about business journalists? Most of us are failed sportswriters. . . . Think about what it takes to be a first-rate business journalist. One must be facile with numbers and financial statements and have the confidence to talk to CEOs, high-level executives, board members, analysts and so forth. One must delve deeply into the industry one writes about--what is the competitive landscape, what are the technological disruptions on the road ahead? It is also critical that one have a coherent global economic view to be able to put a story into context. And one must be a good storyteller.

    Now, if one possesses all of these talents, what are the chances one goes into the low-paying field of journalism? Not great. . . .

    The thin talent pool in business journalism combines with two other forces: Journalism is populated by left-of-center people, many of whom are hostile to business; and traditional journalism itself faces threats of disruption from the Internet, leaving business journalists in a fearful mood, which gets projected into their stories.

    Posted by Wilson Mixon at 10:05 AM in Misc.

    The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. -Adam Smith

    Our Bloggers
    Joshua Hall
    Robert Lawson
    E. Frank Stephenson
    Michael C. Munger
    Lawrence H. White
    Craig Depken
    Tim Shaughnessy
    Edward J. Lopez
    Brad Smith
    Mike DeBow
    Wilson Mixon
    Art Carden
    Noel Campbell


    By Author:
    Joshua Hall
    Robert Lawson
    E. Frank Stephenson
    Michael C. Munger
    Lawrence H. White
    Edward Bierhanzl
    Craig Depken
    Ralph R. Frasca
    Tim Shaughnessy
    Edward J. Lopez
    Brad Smith
    Mike DeBow
    Wilson Mixon
    Art Carden
    Noel Campbell

    By Month:
    February 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004

    Powered by
    Movable Type 2.661

    Site design by