Division of Labour: January 2008 Archives
January 31, 2008
Fashion Week

Had too much stimulus? Not super psyched about football? Then grab your Manolos and give New York's fall fashion week a try beginning Friday through Feb. 8. New York's is the oldest, but dozens of cities globally now have fashion weeks. Wikipedia's list of cities with fashion weeks is good but incomplete. From the official website:

The international coverage of Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week shines the spotlight on New York City and the many talented designers presenting on the runways in Bryant Park. Over 100,000 guests are expected to attend, including some 3,000 members of the press and fashion industry from around the world. The journalists, photographers, broadcasters and bloggers convening in the iconic tents, designed this season as a Greco Roman "Temple of Fashion," will bring the Fall 2008 Collections to fashion-lovers worldwide.

Emphasis added... Why should DOL readers care about fashion? I'll take a stab at that with a series of posts in the week to come.

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 10:37 PM in Culture

John McCain? Say it ain't so!

I just took this reasonably (but not perfectly) crafted quiz that selects the presidential candidate closest to your views. It spit out John McCain! Not Ron Paul?! Huh?!

It could the be quiz itself I guess. It had no questions on campaign finance and I LOATHE John McCain's views there. Plus I have a deep fear that McCain is a hot head, but that character issue wasn't on the quiz. Plus Paul's views (e.g., abortion is a state issue) don't lend themselves to the quiz format very well.

But I can't deny the fact that except for Iraq and Immigration. issues on which I disagree with all of the Republicans (except for Paul on Iraq), I seem close to McCain.

Here were the results:

Agree with McCain:
Taxes
Stem-Cell Research
Health Care
Abortion
Social Security
Line-Item Veto
Energy
Marriage
Death Penalty
Gun Control
Environment
Education

Disagree with McCain:
Iraq
Immigration

Posted by Robert Lawson at 08:48 AM in Politics

January 30, 2008
Stimulus and Tax Withholding

I'm in the stimulus doubters club; I love the metaphor about moving water from the deep end of the pool to the shallow end and expecting the water level to rise.

But set aside such thoughts for a moment. Even if the Senate passed and the president signed the stimulus legislation tomorrow, there are apparently doubts that the government could cut the checks before summer because the check-writing machines will be busy with tax refunds. So here's my question--why not distribute the rebates via temporary reductions in withholding? For example, employers could be instructed to reduce withholding by $300 per month for two months (similar adjustments could be made for people paid weekly, every two weeks, etc.).

Note that I'm not suggesting some sort of trick of reducing withholding but not reducing tax liability. Instead, next year's tax forms could add one more line (hey what's one more!) for filers to net out their rebated tax liability after figuring their liability from the tax tables.

I can think of some legit reasons not to distribute the rebates via withholding adjustments. For example, such a scheme would be a pain for employers and their payroll software. But I wonder if there's something else--adjusting withholding might make some sheeple aware of how baaaadly (sorry, it's late) their paychecks are being fleeced (sorry again). Or maybe the pols think mailing checks is a more effective way of buying votes than a temporary bump in take home pay.

Just a thought ...

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 11:10 PM in Economics

Many Thanks to Bruce Yandle ...

... for his talk "Looking for Heroes in Adam Smith's World" before a standing room crowd at Berry yesterday. Thanks, too, to my colleague Melissa Yeoh for arranging Bruce's visit.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 11:09 PM in Misc.

Clinton vs. Prosperity

From Reuters.

Prophetic?

Posted by Craig Depken at 09:23 PM in Politics

Now blogging from NW Ohio

Having gotten a post-transplant doctor’s OK to drive, I am now in Bowling Green, Ohio, spending the rest of the spring semester at the Social Philosophy and Policy Center of Bowling Green State University. My email address remains the same. If my writing begins to seem a bit flat, blame it on the influence of the local terrain – I swear that the only elevated ground in town is the overpass ramp where Wooster St. crosses the interstate.

From the drive up, I have a question to the management of the I-75-adjacent Wendy’s in Troy, OH: did it ever occur to you that, men being the way they are, putting hot air blowers rather than paper towel dispensers in the men’s room really won’t save you any money when there are stacks of free napkins on the counter just outside the door?

Posted by Lawrence H. White at 03:56 PM in Personal

Marijuana Vending Machines

Today's New York Times carries the AP story.

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- The city that popularized the fast food drive-thru has a new innovation: 24-hour medical marijuana vending machines.

Patients suffering from chronic pain, loss of appetite and other ailments that marijuana is said to alleviate can get their pot with a dose of convenience at the Herbal Nutrition Center, where a large machine will dole out the drug around the clock.

''Convenient access, lower prices, safety, anonymity,'' inventor and owner Vincent Mehdizadeh said, extolling the benefits of the machine.... Mehdizadeh said he spent seven months to develop and patent the black, armored box, which he calls the ''PVM,'' or prescription vending machine.

Here is MPP describing marijuana laws in the 50 states.

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 02:30 PM in Economics

Competing Currencies Revival

If you wear skinny ties long enough, you may eventually be hip again.

Peter Brimelow has reprinted his 1988 Forbes article on competing currencies, my first real press notice. In a new one-paragraph preface he comments that “Ron Paul seems to have single-handedly revived the issue.”

Posted by Lawrence H. White at 10:35 AM in Economics

If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.*

I sent this letter to the Capital University student newspaper this week:

Dear Editor:

Professor Reg Dyck supports “the justice of letting workers choose whether they want to be a part of a union.” (“UNICCO workers team up”, the Chimes, January 24, 2008). I agree! However, under current law once a union is formed by majority vote of the current workers that union then becomes the sole bargaining agent for all workers, current and in the future, who would choose not to be a part of a union. Where is the justice in that?

Regards,
Robert A. Lawson

*From the song Freewill by Rush.

Posted by Robert Lawson at 09:19 AM in Economics

January 28, 2008
Security vs. Privacy

From the Christian Science Monitor

Brilliant.

Posted by Craig Depken at 07:13 PM in Law

Markets in Unclaimed Baggage

Ever wonder what happens to the stuff airlines lose or people don't pick up? You can buy it at the Unclaimed Baggage Center in Scottsboro, Alabama.

Unclaimed Baggage is a one-of-a-kind store snuggled in the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains and bordered by the 70,000 acre Lake Guntersville. Founded in 1970 by Doyle and Sue Owens as a part-time business, it soon became a full-time venture. In 1978, the Owens incorporated the company and watched it prosper as one of the great 'hidden' bargain centers for savvy shoppers.

In 1995, Bryan Owens, son of the founder, acquired Unclaimed Baggage and directed the expansion which includes the current contemporary retail store that covers more than a city block. The store has many amenities including a Concierge Desk to help guests and Cups Espresso Café - serving Starbucks Coffee and Dippin Dots.

Over one million items pass through the store annually. About 60% of the merchandise is clothing with the balance of the store dedicated to cameras, electronics, sporting goods, jewelry, designer optical, books and of course, luggage. The vast majority of items are from unclaimed baggage which, after at least 90 days of intensive tracking by the airlines, are declared unclaimed. However, unclaimed cargo is also available throughout the store.

They've found some cool stuff over the years.

Posted by Robert Lawson at 10:25 AM in Economics

In the long run we're all carbon

Today's Washington Post casts an enticing angle on the carbon offset futility, "Value of U.S. House's Carbon Offsets Is Murky".

In November, the Democratic-led House spent about $89,000 on so-called carbon offsets. This purchase was supposed to cancel out greenhouse-gas emissions from House buildings -- including half of the U.S. Capitol -- by triggering an equal reduction in emissions elsewhere.

The article explains that little of the funds went to "additionality," or reductions that would not have occurred absent the offset purchase. Here's a puzzling quote by the head of the 5-year old Chicago Climate Exchange, through which the House purchased its offsets.

"It basically rewards people for having done things that had environmental good in the past and incentivizes people to do things that have environmental good in the future," said Richard Sandor, the exchange's chairman and chief executive.

He rejected the argument that the exchange shouldn't sell offsets until it can prove that the pollution reductions wouldn't have happened if the money wasn't paid. "We can't, as an exchange, trade hypothetical things," Sandor said.

That a very strange statement from a finance person. Hypothetical market instruments are traded every second--to reduce risk, for example, as with options, futures, and other derivatives. The value of carbon reductions may be fanatical, but it isn't hypothetical. There are willing buyers and sellers, both of whom value carbon emission reductions (hopefully production-nuetral ones). The problem would seem to be that the green exchanges haven't yet matched these values. Five years seems a long time not to equilibrate.

By the way, $89,000 is 0.000000031 of the federal budget.

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 07:44 AM in Economics

January 26, 2008
The End: How Near?

1. Apocalypse Whenever? (Title due to Andrew Ferguson). This article provides useful background reading for listening to the apocalyptics (if one must):

This year is the 40th anniversary of Paul Ehrlich's influential The Population Bomb, a book that predicted an apocalyptic overpopulation crisis in the 1970s and '80s.

Ehrlich's book provides a lesson we still haven't learnt. His prophecy that the starvation of millions of people in the developed world was imminent was spectacularly wrong — humanity survived without any of the forced sterilisation that Ehrlich believed was necessary.
...
Ehrlich was at the forefront of a wave of pessimistic doomsayers in the late 1960s and early '70s. And these doomsayers weren't just cranks — or, if they were cranks, they were cranks with university tenure.

Despite what should be a humiliating failure for his theory of overpopulation, Ehrlich is still employed as a professor of population studies by Stanford University. Similarly, when George Wald predicted in a 1970 speech that civilisation was likely to end within 15 or 30 years, his audience was reminded that he was a Nobel Prize-winning biologist.

I thought this account contained a factual error. Ferguson correctly said (in 1990), "Now, Dr. Ehrlich was an entomologist by training, and some immediately recognized that after many years of rigorous study he had lost the capacity to distinguish between an army of hideous little arthropods swarming over his desk in a Stanford laboratory and an upwardly mobile population of Homo sapiens building tract houses in Palo Alto." (Dixie Lee Ray used to routinely refer to Ehrlich as the bug man.) But, according to Wikipedia, he is now the Bing Professor of Population Studies. Apparently, he's not the only one at Stanford who can't tell the difference.

2. Good news or bad? Depends on what global warming is all about.

Natural gas reservoirs in Michigan’s Antrim Shale are providing new information about global warming and the Earth’s climate history, according to a recent study by Steven Petsch, a geoscientist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. The study is also good news for energy companies hoping to make natural gas a renewable resource.

Petsch found that carbon-hungry bacteria trapped deep in the rock beneath ice sheets produced the gas during the ice age, as glaciers advanced and retreated over Michigan. “Bacteria digested the carbon in the rocks and made large amounts of natural gas in a relatively short time, tens of thousands of years instead of millions,” says Petsch. “This suggests that it may be possible to seed carbon-rich environments with bacteria to create natural gas reservoirs.”


Posted by Wilson Mixon at 02:07 PM in Science

January 25, 2008
Legal tender versus forced tender

On Wednesay during the UK House of Commons question time, Malcolm Bruce (Lib. Dem. – Gordon, Scotland) called on the UK governmentto “change the law and reclassify Scottish notes, which are currently not officially legal tender anywhere in the United Kingdom” so that English sellers are no longer free to refuse Scottish notes.

The Scotsman quotes Bruce’s exchange with the Scottish Secretary Des Browne:

[Bruce:] “It is high time that Scottish banknotes were legally acceptable throughout the UK. … If dollars and euros are acceptable to traders, surely Scottish notes should be. “

The Scottish Secretary replied: "The law is that Scottish banknotes as a method of payment enjoy exactly the same status as all other methods of payment across the United Kingdom.”

Bruce is misrepresenting the case. In fact, it is fully legal to accept Scottish banknotes throughout the UK. It is, however, rightly not compulsory. Scottish banknotes are thus on a par with dollars and euros, not to mention debit cards: neither legal tender nor forced tender. The term “legal tender” is a bit misleading here in that it actually means that a creditor must accept it for a debt denominated in the relevant unit of account. Spot-transaction sellers are usually free to refuse even legal tender, e.g. cabdrivers may legally refuse large-denomination legal tender notes. A note that is not “legal tender” in the debt-clearing sense can still be fully legal to use, and can in fact still be universally accepted in practice, as Scottish banknotes are in Scotland despite not being legal tender even there. (Nor, remarkably, are Bank of England notes legal tender in Scotland. Only coins are legal tender in Scotland.)

Secretary Browne is also slightly misrepresenting the case, in that Scottish notes don’t enjoy exactly the same status as Bank of England notes, which are legal tender in England and Wales.

The Scotsman article goes on the clear up the confusion, but makes one slip when it says:

ALL Scottish banks have the right to print their own notes, but these notes are not officially legal tender in Scotland or England.

In fact, only three Scottish banks retain the right to print their own notes: the Bank of Scotland, the Royal Bank of Scotland, and the Clydesdale Bank. Banks formed after 1844 are denied the right.

Posted by Lawrence H. White at 07:09 PM in Economics

The rate cut and Poole’s dissent

Having cited the Wall St. Journal blog’s prediction that there would be no dissenting votes in the Federal Open Market Committee on the next expected-to-be-large Fed Funds target rate cut, I should note that there was in fact one dissenting vote in the “emergency” meeting earlier this week, by the about-to-retire St. Louis Fed President William Poole. Regrettably Poole didn’t object to the size of the cut, which reduced the Fed Funds target by a whopping 75 basis points to 3.5% from 4.25%, only to its being made before next week’s regularly scheduled FOMC meeting. The market is forecasting a further cut next week.

Using standard analysis (the Taylor Rule), what Fed Funds target would be appropriate? It depends on the relative weights one puts on inflation (the core CPE inflation rate is currently above the supposed 2% ceiling to the Fed’s “comfort zone”) versus the “output gap” (actual real GDP is below its potential level as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office). According to the Taylor Rule chart in the St. Louis Fed’s Monetary Trends, assuming 50-50 weights, as of Q3 2007 a target of 2% PCE inflation was calling for a Fed Funds rate of around 4% (the actual rate was then 5%). By very standard analysis, then, the Fed has already overdone the rate-cutting. (Personally, I'd prefer a lower inflation target and a lower weight on the output gap, but that's beside the point here.)

Why did the Fed over-react? Apparently Bernanke was anxious to bolster stock prices. As the headline to Jay Hancock’s Baltimore Sun column put it, “Fed caves to Wall Street in moment of panic”. Or as the headline to Caroline Baum’s Bloomberg.com column put it: “The Greenspan Put Is Dead. Long Live the Greenspan Put.”

Posted by Lawrence H. White at 11:28 AM in Economics

January 24, 2008
Snail mail, literally

From Reuters Oddly Enough series:

It's official: mail is slow as snails Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:06am EST

WARSAW (Reuters) - It's official. Postal delivery is as slow as snails, at least in Poland.

An IT worker, after receiving a letter on January 3 that was sent on December 20 as priority mail, calculated that a snail would have made it even faster to his home than the letter.

Daily Gazeta Wyborcza said Michal Szybalski calculated that it took 294 hours for the letter to arrive at his home. He also said the distance between his home and the sender was 11.1 kilometers.

Given the distance and the time, the speed of the letter was 0.03775 kilometers per hour. Szybalski calculated that a garden snail travels at around 0.048 kilometers per hour.

Story here.

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 09:51 PM in Funny Stuff

All those bad incentives!

Yesterday, Frank pointed to the "learn & earn" experiment coming soon to two Atlanta elementary schools.

With all the hubbub about incentives these days, it's easy to forget that many incentives don't just plop out of nature but are instead the product of human design. (The most powerful and enduring incentives are a product of human action, undesigned, but that's another conversation.) Incentives are always embedded in institutions, and some institutions are very good at producing very bad incentives. Paying kids to study is a bad substitute for the non-pecuniary incentives (many undesigned) to study, and doing so might also plant the seeds for later false expectations as to scope of remunerable activities. More generally, whenever social planners get ahold of the idea that incentives matter, I see red flags all over.

In yesterday's European Wall Street Journal, Eduardo Nolla hones the point in a beautifully satirical op-ed, "The Points of Life." (HT: Emilio Pacheco). I wanted to quote the whole article, but a few highlights instead.

Life is turning into an awards program.... British Foreign Secretary David Miliband, in his previous role as environment minister, proposed a personal carbon dioxide allowance card. Points would be deducted, for instance, when one bought appliances, gas or electricity, or took a flight. The poor would be able to sell their points to the rich and jet-set crowd.

Of course, that's the cap and trade idea run amok. More:

This is only a starting...point. Once a reward/punishment scheme is put in motion, its own logic will extend it until the totality of human behavior comes under its purview. New York pedestrians could be "pointed" under proposed legislation to ban the use of iPods and cellphones while crossing streets. In the future, a prohibition could also be called for other dangerous activities that diminish your concentration and put your life at risk, such as talking, holding hands, carrying cups of scalding coffee or jogging.

Happily, high-level officials all over the world are pointing in the right direction, aiming to make our lives better and assure us a healthy death. In Finland, new proposed legislation states that fat citizens must pay higher income taxes and higher health care. As a compensation measure, taxes on bicycles have simultaneously been lowered. Government plans are most likely on the way to penalizing anorexia, high cholesterol, bad breath, high blood pressure and soon, one hopes, plain stupidity.

Then there are the enforcment implications.

To run this kind of program efficiently and avoid tax cheaters, we must expect random health checks. If any of a number of clinically researched and expertly chosen health indicators is askew, we will be read our rights before being taken to the hospital: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything your body tells us can and will be held against you. You have the right to a doctor. If you cannot afford a doctor, one will be provided for you."

Okay, you get the gist (although you should read the whole thing for Nolla's political theory context). Overall, Nolla's essay seems like a subtle review Tim Harford's excellent new book, The Logic of Life. If so, when pointing to the dark side of incentives, Nolla and all of us should heed attention to the types of institutions and overt designs lurking behind all those bad incentives.

Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 02:32 PM in Economics  ·  Comments (1)

Don Boudreaux on So-Called Stimulus

Combine keen economics with fantastic writing and get ... another must read from Don Boudreaux.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 01:02 PM in Economics

De gustibus non est disputandum c. 1908

From the Jan. 24, 1908 NYT:

A burglar...had gathered together silverware and jewelry, and was about to depart when he saw a photograph of Miss Margaret McDade, the eighteen year old daughter of Mrs. McDade. The picture showed Miss McDade in a bathing costume. It appealed to him more than did the gold, so he took the picture and left everything else behind. He also left a note, in which he said:

Dear Miss: I had intended to carry off all this junk that I have gathered together until I discovered this picture. What is mere gold compared with such a face and such a figure? Keep your gold - I want none of it. But I must keep this picture, and it will be more to me than all the gold in the universe.

This is ready made for a principles of economics class discussion.

Posted by Craig Depken at 11:33 AM

Opportunity for Students

In today's inbox came a request to pass along the following information on their 2008-09 Koch Associates Program. I am delighted to do so.

The Koch Associate Program is a year-long, paid program designed to develop promising leaders and entrepreneurs interested in liberty and a career in the non-profit arena. Associates range in experience level from recent graduates to those with up to a decade of work experience, and come from many diverse fields and academic majors.

The non-profit assignments cover fascinating fields such as:

· Policy Research and Analysis

· Marketing and Communications

· Development and Donor Relations

· Non-Profit Operations and Project Management

More information on the program can be found here and a .pdf flyer on the program can be found here. From what I have heard from former students, it is a wonderful opportunity.

Posted by Joshua Hall at 10:55 AM

Amazon deforestation

More impact of the ethanol program?

1,287 square miles of rain forest were cleared from August through December, a big increase from the same period a year earlier. ... Mato Grosso is the center of Brazil's important soy production industry, and Latin America's largest nation is second only to the United States for production. ... Brazil last year trumpeted a drop in Amazon deforestation, but the new numbers appeared to indicate that the situation has been reversed.

Posted by Wilson Mixon at 10:36 AM in Economics

"A Freer World is a Better World" by John Stossel

John Stossel's recent column cites the EFW index:

This week's newspapers are full of predictions of an impending recession, and maybe they're right. But the great untold story is the good news: the worldwide boom in economic growth.

"I think one of the best kept secrets is that the world is in the midst of an economic boom, and it is largely driven by increases in economic freedom," says economics professor James Gwartney, director of the Stavros Center for the Advancement of Free Enterprise and Economic Education at Florida State University. "The world has become more free, and, at the same time, growth is soaring to new highs. During 1995 to 2005, the growth rate of per capita GDP in 99 countries for which data are available has increased to 2.2 percent, nearly twice the rate of recent decades. Since 2000, the annual growth rate of per capita GDP has been even more rapid, 3.2 percent."

ATSRTWT

Posted by Robert Lawson at 07:55 AM in Economics

January 23, 2008
Spot On!

Another excellent offering from Mike Lester of the Rome News-Tribune:
LesterCampaignPromises.gif

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 08:21 PM in Politics

Incentives Might Matter: Atlanta School Experiment Edition

From the AJC:

Forty students from Creekside High and Bear Creek Middle schools in Fairburn will be the first to try the "Learn & Earn" program, where students will get paid to attend after-school tutoring programs.

Students will make approximately $8 an hour, and be eligible for bonuses if their grades improve, said Kirk Wilks, district spokesman. The initial students are in the eighth and 11th grades.

... the pilot program will last 15 weeks and pay students for participation and performance. The object of the program is to determine if paying students to study will improve classroom attendance, grades and test scores....

The initiative is funded by Charles Loudermilk, chairman and chief executive officer of Aaron Rents, through the Learning Makes A Difference Foundation.

The students chosen for the program were picked by school staff, based on attendance, grades, test scores and free or reduced lunch status, the release said.

The last paragraph suggests the experiment may not be a random trial. Here's a story about Roland Fryer's pay for grades study in New York.

Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 08:09 PM in Economics

On lost chances c. 1908

From the Jan. 23, 1905 NYT:

REFLECTIONS OF A TIMID INVESTOR

Oh, now that the panic is over,
The ship of Finance off the rocks,
I'm wondering, over and over,
Why I didn't purchse some stocks.

I haven't a great deal of money,
I hate to do anything rash,
But now it appears very funny
I held on, so tight, to my cash.

With railroads and mining stocks rising,
Industrials all on the climb,
My caution was really surprising,
I'l try to be reckless - next time.

ONE OF THEM

Posted by Craig Depken at 02:04 PM in Economics

On political dynasties c. 1908

A fascinating editorial in the Jan. 23, 1908 NYT discusses how the Democratic party might want to get rid of a candidate that has been hanging around for too long:

Why should [William Jennings] Bryan get out unless he is forced out? From the point of view of the Democrat, the patriot, the wise party leader, innumerable reasons may be advanced why he should abandon his pretensions to the candidacy; from the personal point of view of Mr. Bryan, not one. Mr. Bryan is a very successful man. In seeking a third nomination he is pursuing the path of success that has led him to fame and fortune. He is a rich man. He has said that he has money enough to make him comfortable the rest of his life. He has made his fortune by being the candidate, by refusing to relinquish his grasp upon the leadership of the Democratic Party. Because of the position he holds men buy his Commoner, and lecture committees pay him large fees. Mr. Bryan, in the language of the street, has a "good thing." He would be a fool to let go of it.
Might this apply to a certain "third term" seeker today?

Posted by Craig Depken at 02:01 PM in Politics

On school shooting c. 1908

Okay - I admit to a misleading title. The Jan. 23, 1908 NYT reports:

RIFLES FOR SCHOOLBOYS

Congress May Aid Public Schools in Encouragment of Marksmanship


It is probable that within two weeks a bill will be introduced in Congress with a view to the encouragement of marksmanship among the schoolboys throughout the country, and supplying them with rifles and ammunition. The bill wil have the indorsement of President Roosevelt, who is known to favor the project...

Shooting is a growing sport among the schoolboys of this State,and the lads have made marked progress in their work during the past two years...


It is clear that any attempt to pass a similar bill today would flame out in about two seconds. However, here is an interesting thought experiment: Would state sponsored marksmanship increase, reduce, or have no effect on school shootings in which students and teachers are the victims rather than paper targets?

[Update: A helpful reader points out that up until 1996 this program existed as the Department of Civilian Marksmanship of the U.S. Army. In 1996, the program was privatized and renamed the Civilian Marksmanship Program.]

Posted by Craig Depken at 01:53 PM in Culture

State of the Union BINGO

Get your official State of the Union BINGO card here courtesy of the Center for Global Development [link].

Posted by Robert Lawson at 10:23 AM in Economics

January 22, 2008
Anti-smoking ordinances c. 1908

From the Jan. 22, 1908 NYT:

The thousands of women in New York who have never thought of smoking in public places are now prohibited from doing so by law. The Board of Aldermen yesterday passed the Sullivan anti-smoke ordinance by a vote of 73 to 0. Here is the new law:

Section 1. No person, firm, or partnership, corporation, or association, of whatever character, owning or controlling, either as proprietor, or manager, any hotel, restaurant, place of public entertainment, or other place of public resort, in the City of New York, in which people meet and congregate, whether for purpose of refreshment or entertainment, shall allow any female to smoke in any such hotel, restaurant, place of public entertainment, or other place of public resort, such an act being construed as in contravention of the provisions of Subdivision 14 of Section 49 of the Greater New York charter. [emphasis mine]

2. Any violation of the provisions of this ordinance, upon conviction thereof before a City Magistrate, shall be punishable by a fine of not less than $5 nor more than $25, or by imprisonment in the city prison, or by both, but no such imprisonment, however, shall exceed a term of ten days.

The only way to make an anti-smoking law more discriminatory is to make it apply only to one gender.

In 1995 and 2003, New York City made the anti-smoking law gender neutral.

Posted by Craig Depken at 01:31 PM in Law

"At last - a column from TIM that makes sense"

I've been light on the blogging since most of my marginally interesting ideas have been funneled to our local newspaper. I managed to get myself a weekly column on Saturdays, which are mostly fun to read for the reader comments.

This weekend's was about the British health care system. You may have to read quickly because they archive after only a few days and it may be hard to find.

If you're so inclined, check the "Conversations and Editorials" links every weekend to find them.

UPDATE: Well, I guess I've been freed up to contribute again to DoL. The Editorial page editor just called and said I'm being "rotated out." Oh well, it was a good eight-month run. So, from now on, watch for my marginally interesting ideas right here at DoL!

Posted by Tim Shaughnessy at 11:42 AM in Economics

Friedman/Smith/Rogers Quotes

I just read a lecture by Milton Friedman from 1991 and found this quote:

The United States today is more than 50% socialist in terms of the fraction of our resources that are controlled by the govern ment. Fortunately, socialism is so inefficient that it does not control 50% of our lives. Fortunately, most of that is wasted. People worry about government waste; I don't. I just shudder at what would happen to freedom in this country if the govern ment were efficient in spending our money. The really fascinating thing is that our private sector has been so effective, so efficient, that it has been able to produce a standard of life that is the envy of the rest of the world on the basis of less than half the resources available to all of us.

This reminded my of this quote from Adam Smith:

This frugality and good conduct, however, is upon most occasions, it appears from experience, sufficient to compensate, not only the private prodigality and misconduct of individuals, but the public extravagance of government. The uniform, constant, and uninterrupted effort of every man to better his condition, the principle from which public and national, as well as private opulence is originally derived, is frequently powerful enough to maintain the natural progress of things towards improvement, in spite both of the extravagance of government and of the greatest errors of administration. Like the unknown principle of animal life, it frequently restores health and vigour to the constitution, in spite, not only of the disease, but of the absurd prescriptions of the doctor.

And this classic quote from Will Rogers:

Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.

UPDATE: A student sent me this quote (paraphrased) that he remembers from a Pete Boettke lecture he heard at FEE:

Our future is like a horse race between three "S"s. The first two are Smithian gains from trade and Schumpeterian innovation. Government Stupidity would be the third "S" in this race. And so long as Smith and Schumpeter stay ahead of Stupidity then 'tomorrow's troughs will be higher than today's peaks.'
Posted by Robert Lawson at 08:07 AM in Economics

January 21, 2008
Consequences, Unintended or Otherwise

Take 1. Thanks to Dubner and Levitt, NYTimes readers have a chance to learn about the unintended consequences associated with the Endangered Species Act:

Dean Lueck and Jeffrey Michael wanted to gauge the E.S.A.’s effect on the red-cockaded woodpecker, a protected bird that nests in old-growth pine trees in eastern North Carolina. By examining the timber harvest activity of more than 1,000 privately owned forest plots, Lueck and Michael found a clear pattern: when a landowner felt that his property was turning into the sort of habitat that might attract a nesting pair of woodpeckers, he rushed in to cut down the trees.

Take 2: Account of journalist Ezra Levant who is supposed to divulge his motivation for publishing a cartoon:

What a strange place Canada is in 2008, where the police care more about human rights than the human rights commissions do, where fundamentalist Muslims use hate-speech laws drafted by secular Jews, and where a government bureaucrat can interrogate a publisher for 90 minutes, and be shocked when he won't shake her hand in greeting.

Take 3: Fellow blogger Mike Munger's take on McCain-Feingold (posted a year ago, but pertinent given recent results in SC and elsewhere):

BCRA (McCain-Feingold) is bad politics, bad regulation, and bad democracy. The law as it now stands makes narrowly focused interests more powerful than they have been at any time in U.S. history, because of the power of money and television. Where political organizations at one time had to work mostly on mobilizing partisans, in the 21st century electronic means of communication have reduced the transactions costs of politics to the point where organized interests can focus on single issues.

Of course, one needn't be very cynical to suspect that the unintended consequences of BCRA were not unintended by all who supported it.

Posted by Wilson Mixon at 07:59 PM in Economics

Sawing on the anchor rope

Reuters reports:

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said on Thursday inflation expectations are "reasonably well anchored," but the U.S. central bank was determined to uphold its credibility in maintaining price stability. "Our anticipation is that both headline and core inflation will moderate over the next year or two to a level which we view as consistent with price stability," Bernanke told the U.S. House of Representatives Budget Committee.

Translation: Even though the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation, the Personal Consumption Expenditure deflator, is currently running at 2.2% year-over-year, above the Fed’s “comfort zone” (in which 2% inflation = price stability), TRUST US, the inflation rate will come down in 2008 even though we will be accelerating money growth with a big Fed Funds target rate cut at our next meeting, the opposite of pursuing an anti-inflation policy. After all, the market doesn’t yet show signs of rising inflation-rate expectations in survey data or longer-term interest rates. Sharply rising prices of gold and other metals? Sharply falling US dollar exchange value? Mere froth.

But what are inflation expectations “anchored” to? If anything, to a belief that the Fed will tighten when inflation rises above the “comfort zone”. Let’s see how long the Fed can contradict that belief before expectations change. Let's see how long inflation expectations remain anchored while the Fed saws on the anchor rope.

Posted by Lawrence H. White at 07:32 PM in Economics

Rain Man

My rain man, Russ Roberts, on stimulating.

The fact that this commentary was read on NPR....well, it's an irony.

The other side doesn't need equal time: RUSS IS EQUAL TIME. Or, all the equal time we are going to get.

Posted by Michael Munger at 10:54 AM

"an opus of avalanche activity"

When the Mt. Washington avalanche risk is 'HIGH' do not go hiking in Huntington Ravine.

Posted by Robert Lawson at 10:32 AM in Sports

Run, Lance, Run!

Lance Armstrong is running the Boston Marathon this year, and unlike most people running for charity, he actually qualified the old fashioned way.

BOSTON - Seven-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong plans to run the Boston Marathon in April to raise money for his foundation.

Armstrong, 36, qualified for Boston by finishing the 2007 New York City Marathon in two minutes hours 46 minutes 43 seconds, good for 214th place. The Boston qualifying time is 3:15 for men between the ages of 35 and 39.

Posted by Robert Lawson at 08:32 AM in Sports

January 20, 2008
Local Rent Seeking

From the local fish wrapper,

With corporate and private donors stretched thin, taxpayers might be the best hope for solving the immediate financial problems of the Columbus Symphony.

The symphony is pinning its hopes on a city-county arts package -- dubbed Thrive in Five -- to help eliminate its deficit this year. The fundraising campaign would provide $4 million annually for 16 arts groups -- including $1.2 million for the symphony the first year.

Sigh. At least they're not selling it as an "economic stimulus package".


Btw, welcome back Larry. We all hope you're doing well!

Posted by Robert Lawson at 11:31 AM in Culture ~ in Economics

January 19, 2008
Where have the inflation hawks gone?

CPI inflation for the calendar year just ended (December 2007 over December 2006) was 4.1%, the highest annual figure since 1990. And yet the FOMC is expected to lower the Fed Funds target by 50 or even 75 basis points at its next meeting. Will there even be any dissent? The Wall St. Journal economics blog, reading the tea leaves of public statements by each of the FOMC members, says no. Even the most “hawkish” of the regional Reserve Bank presidents (Jeffrey Lacker of Richmond and Charles Plosser of Philadelphia) are “falling in line behind Bernanke”. Meanwhile “None of the governors has a history of dissent” (sadly, this includes Randy Kroszner); “nor does New York Fed President Timothy Geithner”.

Meanwhile, over at Vox Baby, Andrew Samwick asks the right question about the supposed desirability of easy money:

Over the past few years, cheap credit and imprudent lending policies by some bad actors generated excessive consumption and investment in the real estate sector. This boosted economic activity beyond the level that would have prevailed with policies that we now wish, with hindsight, had been in place. ... If we acknowledge that bad loans fueled the activity, why is it now a widely shared policy objective to maintain that level of activity?

"We Need Economic Stimulus" is an emperor without any clothes.

Posted by Lawrence H. White at 10:28 PM in Economics

Football as king c. 1908

From the Jan. 19, 1908 NYT we learn that football was king in Michigan even back then:

At the annual Michigan Athletic Association today it was shown that the total receipts of the last fiscal year were $33,894 [$776,000 in 2006 dollars]. Of this ammount, football brought in $25,894 [$580,000 in 2006 dollars and 76% of total revenue]. The baseball games lost $800 and track athletics $2,666. The management put $18,000 into the Ferry Field improvement fund and has a balance of $7,816. Last year the balance carried over was $10,545.
In 2006, football at the University of Michigan generated $50.982 million in revenues, approximately 83% of all athletics related revenue (Equity in Athletics data here).

We know that Michigan football is worth more today than one hundred years ago, but it is interesting to see that Michigan football is worth more today relative to the other sports on campus.

On holding parents accountable c. 1908

Contemporary threats to punish parents for childhood obesity sound novel and to many a bit of an over-reach by government schools. Yet, perhaps the idea isn't as new as we think.

The Jan. 19, 1908 NYT contains is a story concerning hygiene in the public schools:

This plan calls for the establishment of a Department of School Hygiene under the control of the Board of Education. This department would consist of a corps of physicians and nurses, under the direction of a medical expert skilled in the diseases of children. It would be clothed with the power, according to Dr. Maxwell [City Superintendent], not only to make physical examinations, but to prosecute parents who fail to put their children in proper physical condition to profit by the work of the school.
Prosecute parents? Wow.

Education economists today discuss the "education production function" for which the inputs are the student, her teachers, her peers, and the infrastructure. This is the same intuition being offered in the 1908 plan, that undernourished and otherwise physically unfit children are not efficient inputs to the education production function.

The good Dr. Maxwell (of 1908) offers some reasons for why city kids are not physically fit:

Lack of exercise, city children seldom having to walk more than two or three blocks to school, and having little work to perform about the home that would develop muscles and breathing capacity; crowding in poorly lighted and poorly ventilated apartments, which results in various forms of tuberculosis; lack of space for free play; lack of interesting occupation outside of school hours; excessive noise; lack of sufficient sleep; insufficient or unwise feeding; uncleanly habits of person...
Many of these reasons are now applicable to the suburban dweller as well, except, perhaps, the crowding in poorly lighted and ventilated apartments. After substituting asthma and other respiratory problems for tuberculosis, the list is almost exactly the same as we hear directed towards both city and suburban dweller. How many kids are washing dishes and cutting firewood in the suburbs today?

Dr. Maxwell then points out the effects of these maladies:

These conditions tend to produce various forms of nervousness, lowered vitality, defective eyesight, defective teeth, and probably growths in the nose and throat which restrict respiration and drive the child into reckless mischief and defiance of authority.
Is the nervousness of yesterday the ADHD of today? (Note: Although my two kids are 3.5 and 1.5 yrs old, I have no experience with ADHD) Is the "lowered vitality" of 1908 the "couch potato" or "video game fatigue" of today? Is there evidence that the maladies of today lead to poor eyesight and teeth? If so, then it would seem that after dedicating untold billions of dollars (and the efforts those dollars represent) to these problems, we haven't come all that far.


Dr. Maxwell then proposes the "make an example of somebody" approach to getting the parents in line:

If half a dozen parents were fined or imprisoned for failures, after repeated warnings to provide their children with necessary eyeglasses or to have adenoid growths removed, the example thus set would do more lasting good than any preaching on the subject.
At least he didn't suggest throwing one or both of the parents up against the wall.

I would suggest that Dr. Maxwell's plan was just about 100 years ahead of his time, although perhaps his plan will be implemented for a radically different reason.

Posted by Craig Depken at 03:00 PM in Culture

The Gentle Cynic c. 1908

From the Jan. 19, 1908 NYT:

  • The fellow who blows his own horn may come out at the little end of it.
  • Sometimes fate makes a hero of a man, but he can't always hold the job.
  • So long as a man isn't miserable he ought to be happy.
  • Many a man complains that he is misunderstood when he is really unintelligible.
  • Posted by Craig Depken at 02:14 PM in Culture

    Let the Vote Buying Bidding Begin

    Hillary Clinton Jan. 11:

    Hillary Clinton is unveiling an aggressive $70 billion stimulus package today that would boost the U.S. economy and help families who have been hit hardest by the economic downturn across America.

    Reuters Jan 13:

    Amid growing worries about a worsening of the U.S. economy, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama proposed a $75 billion economic stimulus plan on Sunday that includes worker tax credits, a one-time pension supplement and help to homeowners facing foreclosure.

    The plan would include an immediate $250 tax credit for workers, which could double if the economy worsens, a one-time $250 supplement to Social Security payments ....

    The bit about giving Social Security folks--remember seniors have higher voter turnout--is yet another sign that Obama is above average for the politician species.

    Hillary Clinton Jan. 17:

    Last week, I laid out my blueprint for stimulus of up to $110 billion, including $70 billion in immediate measures and $40 billion in contingent tax rebates.

    After seeing additional signs of economic weakness and hearing the stories of countless voters in Nevada, California and across the country, I am convinced that we need my full $110 billion package immediately to effectively stimulate the economy.

    Friday, Jan. 18:

    As President Bush laid out his vision for an economic stimulus that could reach $150 billion, ...

    UPDATE (1/19 9PM): Well that didn't take long--Romney has now upped the ante:

    Coupled with a $32 billion program Romney has already proposed to eliminate taxes on all savings for those making under $200,000 annually, the package costs $233 billion — or about 1.7 percent of the gross domestic product.

    Romney's proposal is significantly different from the previous plans--it has little in the way of rebates and focuses more on improving incentives. His proposal to reduce the corporate income tax rate is especially noteworthy, albeit not so much for any short run stimulus it would provide.

    Romney's plan is more economically literate than the AP reporter who wrote the article on Romney's proposal. The reporter, Glen Johnson, needs to brush up on tax incidence:

    [Romney's plan also calls for] an elimination of Social Security payroll taxes for workers over 65 that would cost $20 billion and equally benefit businesses and individuals.
    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 09:42 AM in Economics

    January 18, 2008
    Stimulus Economics

    Two versions: The (correct) Russ Roberts version and the (not correct but delightfully snarky) photo version:

    flushing-money.jpg

    Photo via JC Bradbury's Sabernomics blog.

    UPDATE: For more stimulating offerings see Bruce Bartlett in the WSJ (a much better piece than his fair tax hack job), PrestoPundit (stimulus = economic crank), Mankiw, and Tyler on MR.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 05:03 PM in Economics

    January 17, 2008
    Water "treatment" c. 1908

    In a reversal from the current discussion about the appropriate use of water:

    For having doused his wife with cold water while she lay in a bed Edward J. Donnelly of 140 Hobart Avenue, Bayonne, was yesterday sentenced to ninety days by Recorder Lazarus. Donnelly said he tried the water cure on his wife to stop her from talking, and said she talked so incessantly that he could not sleep. He slept after he threw the water over her.

    Posted by Craig Depken at 11:10 AM in Misc.

    Volunteer Fire Fighers c. 1908

    An interesting example of cooperation is reported in the Jan 17, 1908 NYT:

    Probably the most remarkable manner of extinguishing a fire occurred to-day at Boswell, a mining town near here [Johnstown, Penn], when hundreds of men, women, boys, and girls saved the town from destruction by throwing snowballs.

    The town has no fire department, and water is scarce. The flames had gained much headway, and a building in which was stored sufficient powder to blow up the village was threatened.

    As a last resource practically the entire population began throwing thousands of snowballs made from soft, wet snow, and after a time prevented the explosion and confined the flames to a half dozen buildings.


    Posted by Craig Depken at 11:06 AM in Economics

    Atlas Shurgged (a little) c. 1908

    Throughout 1906, 1907 and into 1908, many states and cities passed price ceilings on train travel. However, while the marginal cost of an additional passenger on a railroad car is likely close to zero, much like the marginal cost of an additional passenger on an airplane is close to zero, the average variable cost of an additional passenger is not zero. This is important because policy makers (and the public at large) seem to believe that if marginal cost is zero then price should be close to zero and somehow the firm will still make a positive profit.

    However, while price equals marginal cost in perfectly competitive (or perfectly elastic demand) markets, in markets with downward sloping demand curves, price and marginal cost are rarely equal to each other. Indeed, if a firm finds that price is less than average variable cost, they might temporarily shut down in the short-term. Consider baseball teams that shutdown during the winter months, not because no single person would attend a baseball game in January but because there are not enough people willing to attend such that price is greater than or equal to average variable cost.

    Further, a firm will permanently shut-down or move out of a market (whether geographic or product) if they think demand will not recover so that price will eventually exceed average variable cost. In the case of legislated price ceilings, price cannot respond to demand changes and therefore price might not exceed average variable cost.

    This situation is succinctly reported in the Jan. 17, 1908 NYT:

    Announcement was made to-day by the Michigan Central Railroad Company that on Jan. 19 seven passenger trains on four divisions of the road will be discontinued. While the Michigan Central always makes a Winter readjustment to its passenger train schedule and discontinues some service, it is state that the falling off of receipts under the two-cents fare law is responsible for the order being more sweeping and wider than is generally the case.
    As a big fan of Atlas Shrugged I find this story interesting because the Michigan Central did the unthinkable, at least from the point of view of the legislature: they chose not to run trains. The loss of revenue to the Michigan Central and consumer surplus of those who would have ridden the seven trains would seem to be pure dead-weight loss due to the intervention.

    How long until the Michigan Central was accused of a) discriminating against certain consumers; b) putting profits over people; c) violating some law requiring them to run trains at a loss; d) all of the above?

    I will keep an eye open for more on this story.

    Posted by Craig Depken at 10:56 AM in Economics

    Catching up via quick hits

    Some quick hits I've meant to blog about more extensively, but lately I've been very short on time.

    1. Of light and carbon: From www.spiked.com, here is the best article I've seen summarizing the incandescent vs. flourescent craze. To reduce my carbon footprint, I henceforth resolve to boycott "carbon copy" and "blind carbon copy" emails.

    2. Dani Rodrik recently posted a short paper, "Second Best Institutions," that is highly worthwhile but raises many puzzles.

    3. Bob Lawson is visiting Liberty Fund today to give a talk on why we don't see countries with both high political freedoms and low economic freedoms.

    4. Harvey Mansfield says economic thinking lacks virtue.

    5. Alex Tabarrok says don't sweat the recession talk and reminds us (ahem!) that the real impact of economics lies less in clever applications of welfare analytics to Christmas, but more in enlightened understanding of growth and prosperity.

    Amazingly, there are only about 6 million scientists and engineers in the entire world, nearly a quarter of whom are in the U.S. Poverty means that millions of potentially world-class scientists today spend their lives trying to eke out a subsistence living, rather than leading mankind’s charge into the future. But if the world as a whole were as wealthy as the U.S. and were devoting the same share of population to research and development, there would be more than five times as many scientists and engineers worldwide.

    6. Finally, the January issue of W highlights the fascinating artist Thomas Nozkowski. There are some insights into originality and genius. I like the rich descriptions of his quirky, creatively-destructive methods and their beautiful results.

    Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 10:39 AM in Misc.

    Anti-market Indoctrination

    From "Europe’s Philosophy of Failure" by Stefan Theil:

    In France and Germany, students are being forced to undergo a dangerous indoctrination. Taught that economic principles such as capitalism, free markets, and entrepreneurship are savage, unhealthy, and immoral, these children are raised on a diet of prejudice and bias. Rooting it out may determine whether Europe’s economies prosper or continue to be left behind.

    My reading of civics and U. S. history textbooks that are used in American schools suggests that the phenomenon attributed to European schooling is not uniquely European.

    One can take heart from the fact that the author is a Newsweek editor.

    Posted by Wilson Mixon at 10:22 AM

    Compensating Losers

    Steven Landsburg on the appropriateness of compensating for displacements due to free trade:

    For many decades, schoolyard bullying has been a profitable occupation. All across America, bullies have built up skills so they can take advantage of that opportunity. If we toughen the rules to make bullying unprofitable, must we compensate the bullies?

    Bullying and protectionism have a lot in common. They both use force (either directly or through the power of the law) to enrich someone else at your involuntary expense. If you’re forced to pay $20 an hour to an American for goods you could have bought from a Mexican for $5 an hour, you’re being extorted. When a free trade agreement allows you to buy from the Mexican after all, rejoice in your liberation — even if Mr. McCain, Mr. Romney and the rest of the presidential candidates don’t want you to.

    Posted by Wilson Mixon at 10:14 AM in Economics

    January 16, 2008
    Iceland’s government balks at free choice in currency

    Iceland currently has its own currency, the kronur. The government has no plans to join the EU, let alone officially adopt the euro. Nonetheless, Iceland Review reports,

    Last fall Kaupthing Bank announced that it planned to adopt the euro as its operational currency at the beginning of 2008, which would include the bank settling its accounts and submit financial statements in euros. Other companies have already made that move, including investment bank Straumur-Burdarás.

    Reuters elaborates:

    Kaupthing wants to switch to the single currency to make its accounts easier to compare with other banks.

    Kaupthing is Iceland’s largest commercial bank. It recently acquired a Dutch bank, and is active in wider European markets.

    The Icelandic government has blocked the bank’s adoption of the euro, however, ruling that the bank may not adopt the euro in 2008. A decision about 2009 will come later. Kaupthing Bank is appealing the decision to Minister of Finance, with a final ruling expected in a few weeks.

    The Icelandic government apparently fears a “creeping euroization” of the economy. Reuters again:

    The central bank said in a statement on its website that it objects to domestic financial companies fully adopting foreign currencies in their accounts.

    "If financial companies are, as well, heading towards listing their equities in a foreign currency and reducing their business in the domestic currency, then the central bank believes there is ample reason to pause and consider the consequences for Iceland's monetary system," it said.

    The main consequences for the central bank, of course, are reductions in the central bank’s macroeconomic control and seigniorage income from being sole issuer of reserve currency. For the users of currency, the option to adopt a foreign currency as unit of account or medium of exchange can only have a positive value. So what it boils down to is: Will the Icelandic government place its own interests above those of its citizens?

    HT: Kurt Schuler

    Posted by Lawrence H. White at 12:47 PM in Economics

    Spot the macroeconomic fallacy

    Accompanying an inflation-rate chartlet on the front page of today’s St. Louis Post-Dispatch is the following bit of text: “The more prices rise, the more people tighten their wallets.”

    Class assignment (choose one):

    1) Explain why, if “the more prices rise” means “the higher the inflation rate”, the above statement is inconsistent with the standard theory according to which an individual’s demand to hold money falls as the opportunity cost of holding money rises.

    2) Explain why, if “the more prices rise” means “at a higher price price level, ceteris paribus”, the above statement is inconsistent with the aggregate supply / aggregate demand model of the price level as derived from the equation of exchange. That is, if we consider two points on the AD curve, explain why it makes no sense to suggest at the point to the NW (at a higher price level), nominal spending is smaller. For extra credit, explain why it makes no sense to treat the price level as a parameter that shifts the AD curve rather than as an endogenous variable.

    Posted by Lawrence H. White at 11:43 AM in Economics

    January 15, 2008
    Oink, Oink--Sports Pork

    From an AJC article on Atlanta's AAA baseball team moving from Richmond to a $38m taxpayer funded stadium in Gwinnett County GA:

    Last July, a consultant reported building a stadium with 5,500 permanent seats and grass seating for another 1,500 would cost $25 million to $30 million. Such a stadium also would include 16 private suites, 300 club seats and 2,300 parking spaces within walking distance of the stadium.

    Convention, Sports & Leisure International, the Minnesota-based consulting firm hired by the Gwinnett Convention & Visitors Bureau, found that building and operating such a stadium could create hundreds of jobs, generate up to $7 million in consumer spending every year and generate as much as $12 million in tax revenue over a 30-year period.

    The firm's study concluded that Gwinnett County provides "one of the strongest markets in the country to support a minor-league baseball team."

    News reports in Richmond say community leaders are angry over the minor league team's departure from their community after more than four decades.

    But at least one sports industry figure there says the loss is more emotional than financial.

    "I dont think the direct economic impact of the Braves being here or not is that great," said John Lugbill, executive director of the Metropolitan Richmond Sports Backers, a public-private sports commisson partially funded by tax dollars. "But the positive attributes to the community are important."

    See also Skip Sauer's post at The Sports Economist; be sure to read Rod Fort's comment on the post.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 06:03 PM in Economics ~ in Sports

    Context

    From John J. DiIulio Jr.'s analysis ("The Wacko-Vet Myth: Now echoed by the New York Times") of the Times's drive-by shooting ("Across America, Deadly Echoes of Foreign Battles"):

    The Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) and other veterans' advocacy groups are absolutely correct that not merely "many" but the vast majority of veterans not only remain completely law-abiding but go on to lead stable and productive personal, professional, and civic lives. Assuming 121 homicide cases in relation to 749,932 total discharges through 2007, 99.98 percent of all discharged Iraq and Afghanistan veterans have not committed or been charged with homicide.

    And assuming 121 cases and 749,932 total discharges, the homicide offending rate for the discharged veterans would be 16.1 per 100,000. The U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) has demographic data aplenty on homicide offending rates. For instance, in 2005, for white males aged 18-24, the rate was about 20 per 100,000. The Times opined that 121 was the "minimum" number, even as it counted veterans charged but not convicted with veterans tried and found guilty. Doubling the number to 242 would double the rate to 32.2 per 100,000.

    Such crude but contextualizing calculations aside, the right question to ask is whether the veterans, other things being equal (controlling for age, race, gender, education, income, prior criminal history, and other variables), offend at rates that are significantly different from otherwise comparable groups (including groups that have an extreme PTSD incidence). Without doing the relevant statistical (multiple-regression) analyses with all the requisite empirical data, it is impossible to say.

    Posted by Wilson Mixon at 05:29 PM in Politics

    I fall victim to the drug war

    As I've mentioned, I had transplant surgery on Tuesday. After removing my IV lines, the doctors put me on the controlled substance Percocet for pain relief, to be taken as needed up to 4x daily. (Note: the stuff works.) Under federal rules, I had to request each dose, and the nurse had to watch me take it upon delivery. (I might hoard and resell them?) The hospital could not give me any Percocet to take home with me when I was discharged on Saturday. But they could write me a prescription, to be filled at my pharmacy. Problem: I was discharged at 7pm, and my pharmacy had closed at 6pm. The hospital pharmacy was also closed. So, thanks to federal anti-narcotic hysteria, I would be without pain relief until my pharmacy opened on Sunday at 10am. The hospital said that they had faxed all my new prescriptions there, so my agent went to pick them up. But no Percocet was among the pills she returned with – under federal rules, prescriptions for narcotic pain relievers can’t be faxed or phoned in; only presented in person in hard copy. She had to make a second trip, carrying the written script they’d given me.

    I think it's time to return to a free market in narcotics.

    Posted by Lawrence H. White at 03:56 PM in Economics

    Ode to the Constitution c. 1908

    From the Jan. 15, 1908 NYT:

    THE CONSTITUTION

    Old George the Third of merry fame
    Possessed a great Big Stick,
    J. Caesar had another one
    With which he loved to lick;
    O. Cromwell armed himself with one
    To smite his fellow-man;
    In fact, each tyrant, good or bad,
    Had one since earth began.

    When this Republic's fathers met
    To make a nation free,
    They took all big sticks in the world
    That were or yet to be;
    They ground the wood into a pulp,
    A deed of might note,
    And on the paper thus produced
    The Constitution wrote.

    McLandburgh Wilson

    Perhaps Mr. Wilson was a bit optimistic?

    Posted by Craig Depken at 10:50 AM in Culture

    If It's So Rotten, Why Are You Running for It?

    Hillary Clinton likens White House to prison

    Perhaps it has something to do with her soaring narcissism and lust for power.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 09:16 AM in Politics

    APEE/MBMI Contest: New Deadline!

    The deadline for the APEE/MBMI Economic Communicators Contest has been extended to February 22.

    Come on people, let's get those videos rolling! We're talking about a first prize of $10,000 here.

    Posted by Robert Lawson at 08:47 AM in Economics

    Caught My Eye

    1. From the ok for me but not for thee department: NY Mayor Bloomberg is photographed nibbling on some Cheez-Its (0.5g of trans fats per serving) after leading NY's ban on trans fats.

    2. MIT economists Jonathan Gruber and David Rodriguez find:

    Our best estimate is that physicians provide negative uncompensated care to the uninsured, earning more on uninsured patients than on insured patients with comparable treatments. Even our most conservative estimates suggest that uncompensated care amounts to only 0.8% of revenues, or at most $3.2 billion nationally.

    Not that it'll stop the socialized medicine crowd but this paper is very important because it rebuts one of the alleged failings of the current system.

    3. Cato's David Boaz nominates someone for The Diff (previous installments here, here, and here).

    4. Mark Steyn's column on capitalism as the real agent of change is a must read. See especially the paragraphs on John Edwards.

    5. Carpe Diem posts on Krugman's recession forecasts and mortgage fraud via fake paystubs.

    6. MR is hosting a book forum on Tim Harford's The Logic of LIfe. I got an advance copy and read it over Christmas break. I thought it was superb; I am pleased to see someone pushing back against the behavioral economics tide of the past few years.

    7. I also read and liked John Lott's Freedomnomics. I would have liked it better if it had less emphasis on rebutting of Freakonomics. I don't think Freakonomics is flawless (I hated the chapter on baby names), but I thought Lott's constant harping on it was tiresome. Moreover, like Russ Roberts comments on Lojack and concealed handguns, I don't think of Lott's and Levitt's work as opposites.

    I think both books miss a plausible explanation for the reason realtors take longer to sell their houses and get higher sales prices. Many people who put houses on the market do so because they are moving out of town. They have higher monitoring costs to make sure the house isn't burglarized. They also have higher transactions costs to consummate a sale from out of town. These factors push someone moving out of town (or across a large city like Chicago) to sell faster and at a lower price. Realtors, on the other hand, probably are not moving out of town and therefore have lower costs to hold out a bit longer for a higher price. I also suspect that it is somewhat common for realtors to deliberately own two (or more) houses at once. They then put both on the market and sell the one that draws the more attractive bids. People who are not planning to simultaneously market two homes may face liquidity constraints that nudge them to sell their first home sooner (and at a lower price) before taking on their next home.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 12:17 AM in Misc.

    January 13, 2008
    Papers please! Papiere bitte! Papeles, por favor!

    Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff says,

    Only three categories of people need be "disappointed" by the forthcoming identification cards, the Homeland Security chief told attendees at a midday press conference here: terrorists, illegal immigrants, and con-men.

    I'm not a terrorist, illegal immigrant or con man, but I'm not happy about this. So make that four categories, you nazi wannabe.

    Posted by Robert Lawson at 06:37 PM in Politics

    January 12, 2008
    Medical update

    My kidney transplant surgery on Tuesday was successful. Recovery proceded at what is apparently the normal pace: I slept for the next 20 hours, sat up a little on Wednesday, began walking a little on Thursday, got my IVs disconnected and meds adjusted on Friday, and waited around all day Saturday to be discharged. I'm now home resting. Thanks to all those who sent good wishes.

    Posted by Lawrence H. White at 09:53 PM in Personal

    UNC_CH 1886

    On the status of the University of North Carolina in the late 19th century:


    Ad placed in the Waynesville (N. C.) Daily News on July 12, 1886.

    University of North Carolina

    The next session opens August 26th. Fifteen Professors offer a wide range of instruction in Literature, Science and Philosophy. The Law School and the Department of Normal Instruction are fully equipped. Special higher training in all the departments is provided for graduates of the University and of other Colleges free of charge. Select Library of 20,000 volumes; Reading Room of 114 Periodicals. Total collegiate expenses $88.00 a year. Board $8.00 to $13.50 per month. Sessions begin last Thursday in August. For full information, address
    President Kemp P. Battle, L. L. D.
    Chapel Hill, N. C.

    Posted by Wilson Mixon at 03:27 PM in Misc.

    European Growth

    Paul Krugman's take on European vs. American economic growth:

    Since 2000, employment has actually grown a bit faster in Europe than in the United States — and since Europe has a lower rate of population growth, this has translated into a substantial rise in the percentage of working-age Europeans with jobs, even as America’s employment-population ratio has declined.

    In particular, in the prime working years, from 25 to 54, the big gap between European and U.S. employment rates that existed a decade ago has been largely eliminated. If you think Europe is a place where lots of able-bodied adults just sit at home collecting welfare checks, think again.

    What’s behind Europe’s comeback? It’s a complicated story, probably involving a combination of deregulation (which has expanded job opportunities) and smart regulation. ... What European countries definitely haven't done is dismantle their strong social safety nets. Universal health care is a given. ... [A]nd European taxes are very high by U.S. standards.

    In short, Europe continues to be a big-government sort of place. And that’s why it’s important to get the real story of the European economy out there.

    I suspect that the rise in the percentage of working-age Europeans with jobs relates to Europe's relatively belated increase in female labor force participation. Also, American labor force participation was at its historic high when the most recent recession set in.

    In any event, this article calls into question Krugman's thesis:

    From 2000 to 2004 (the last years for which data are provided), the real GDP of OECD countries grew 8% and the US's grew 10%. Those years include the 9/11 attacks and a short recession in the US. ... However, some countries within the OECD did have growth exceeding 10% over those years. Can we spot any patterns? ...

    The country that cut its government spending the most, Ireland, had the fastest growth. In fact, Ireland cut its government spending to a level below that of the US. With the exception of the Netherlands, every country with below OECD-average growth had cut spending by less than 10% of GDP. On the other hand, of the seven countries that had cut spending by more than 10% of GDP, six had above average growth. Generally, those countries with lower government spending and deeper cuts in recent spending enjoyed the fastest growth.

    Of course there were exceptions, but all "new Europe" countries on the list (Slovakia, Hungary, Czech Republic, Poland) enjoyed growth of 12% or more, and most "old Europe" countries, notably France and Germany, saw single-digit growth in that period. ...

    As for the US, it is no longer the small government tiger it once was or Paul Krugman thinks still is. In 2006, government spending in the US was 36.5% of GDP, a higher percentage than that of Ireland, Slovakia and Switzerland. And the US has not cut spending all that much, recently. It cut about the same as the OECD total, and a smaller amount than 15 of the 22 European countries listed in the statistical abstract.

    Posted by Wilson Mixon at 02:55 PM in Economics

    Harvard c. 1908

    From the Dec. 11, 1908 NYT:

    The total enrollment of students at Harvard University this year is 5,763. The total is a decrease of 26 from last year.

    The total registration in the Department of Arts and Sciences is 2,836. The Divinity School has 31 members, the Law School 716, the Medical School 345, the Dental School 68, the Busely[?] Institute, devoted to agricultural courses, 22, and Radcliffe College 167.

    Posted by Craig Depken at 02:31 PM in Misc.

    Want change?

    Mark Steyn on the source of change:

    But it's capitalism that's the real "agent of change." Politicians, on the whole, prefer stasis, at least on everything for which they already have responsibility. That's the lesson King Canute was trying to teach his courtiers when he took them down to the beach and let the tide roll in: Government has its limits. In most of the Western world, the tide is rolling in on demographically and economically unsustainable entitlements, but that doesn't stop politicians getting out their beach chairs and promising to create even more. That's government "change."

    Posted by Wilson Mixon at 10:10 AM in Economics

    January 11, 2008
    Maybe They're Onto Something

    In the Indiana voter ID case that was argued before the Supreme Court earlier this week, the attorneys challenging the law argued that it should be overturned even if imposes only a minimal inconvenience for a small percentage of voters. (Transcript here in pdf; see pp. 65-66.)

    I happen to think that requiring ID for voting is a reasonable precaution against fraud. Yet, just think how much nuisance could be eliminated if we applied the same principle of not causing even minimal inconvenience to other government policies. Start with the tax system--anything other than a radical simplification of the current behemoth would run afoul of the minimal inconvenience criterion. (Indeed, a strict interpretation might allow for nothing more than a head tax.) Draft registration--gone. Invasive banking rules--gone. Oh the fun we could have if the Supreme Court buys into the minimal inconvenience doctrine!

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 12:08 PM in Law

    A Gathering of the Rent-Seekers?

    The Wall Street Journal is sponsoring an executive conference called ECO:nomics--Creating Environmental Capital. A glance at the list of featured participants reveals several folks notable for advocating "creating capital" the good old fashioned way--suckling at the government teat. There's the CEO of Archer Daniels Midland (think ethanol subsidies), Vinod Khosla (a player in California's failed proposal to subidize alternative energy), and the CEOs of a couple of companies hoping to use cap and trade systems to their advantage (e.g., GE). In fairness, I should note that the speaker list also includes at least one counterweight--Fred Smith of the CEI.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 10:38 AM in Economics

    Economics Communicator's Contest: Deadline Feb 1

    The Association of Private Enterprise Education and the Market-Based Management Institute have teamed up again to sponsor an Economic Communicator's Contest

    Top prize is a cool ten grand! Last year's event was a huge success. Congrats to winners Dirk Mateer, Howie Baetjer, and Ken Schoolland. [results]

    Read More »

    Posted by Robert Lawson at 07:53 AM in Economics

    January 09, 2008
    Marketplace on Public Radio

    I'm supposed to have some sound bites on the public government radio show "Marketplace" sometime tonight [6pm in most places but you can check local listings here]. I was interviewed about the role of the "rule of law" in economic development. The journalist found me after looking at Ben Powell's new edited collection Making Poor Nations Rich, in which I have a chapter.

    [UPDATE: I made it on at the 2:55 mark for about a 30 second bit. Listen here.]

    Posted by Robert Lawson at 10:59 AM in Economics

    Thousands show up for shot at Wal-Mart job

    From today's AJC:

    They came in droves — high school students, retirees, young moms, the unemployed — all for a shot at a job at a new Wal-Mart on Memorial Drive in central DeKalb County.

    In just two days, and with virtually no advertising or even any signs, a staggering 7,500 people filled out applications for one of the 350 to 400 available jobs.

    Delois Zeigler was among those who packed a meeting room Tuesday at Saint Philips AME Church near Avondale Estates, hoping to soon be wearing Wal-Mart's trademark blue uniform.

    "I need a job," said Zeigler, who has held temporary cleaning and cooking jobs since moving to metro Atlanta two months ago. "I'm open to anything."

    The big turnout speaks volumes about the state of the local economy, said Bruce Kaufman, a Georgia State University economics professor. While the unemployment rate in the area remains relatively low, Kaufman said the large number of job-seekers suggests that many people are either under-employed or had stopped looking for work.

    "People are trying to upgrade to a better job," he said.

    Hmmm... maybe those Wal-Mart wages aren't so bad after all.

    UPDATE (1/11):

    For the fourth consecutive day, people waited in long lines Thursday for a shot at a job at a new Wal-Mart in DeKalb County, pushing the total number of applicants beyond 10,000.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 10:11 AM in Economics

    Reminders

    APEE's 2008 conference will be held in Las Vegas in April. Submit a paper here (or email me directly if you have a public econ/public choice paper). Graduate students and junior faculty can apply for financial support via the young scholars program. Classroom wizards should enter the the economic communicators contest.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 09:40 AM in Economics

    January 08, 2008
    Bryan's cross c. 1908

    From the Jan. 8, 1908 NYT:

    "I know that some people are giving much thought to the money question, but that is not worrying me much. The people of this country have made it possible for me to acquire an independent income for all time to come, so I have no worry on that score."

    This remark was made by William Jennings Bryan toward the close of his address here [Omaha, Neb.] last night before the Jacksonian Club. This is Mr. Bryan's first statement as to the extent of his own finances.

    Here's WJB's famous "Cross of Gold" speech.

    Posted by Craig Depken at 10:36 AM in Politics

    Thank you, thank you very much

    Pour a little out for The King. Today is Elvis's 73rd birthday.

    I cannot draw the line so starkly as Dell (Gary Busey) from the underrated 1983 comedy, "D.C. Cab," in which Dell proclaims in victory, "Okay but I don't work on January the 8th, cause that's Elvis's birthday." Alas, I am at work. (Can't you tell?)

    Here is some mindless Elvis birthday trivia.

    My favorite Velvet Elvis.

    Weird Al Yankovic's tribute to Elvis velvets.

    My, what you can find on the Internet in five minutes!

    Posted by Edward J. Lopez at 09:47 AM in Funny Stuff

    January 07, 2008
    Marty, Marty, Marty

    That madcap Marty Feldstein is at it again....taking his comedic stylings on the road.

    Read More »

    Posted by Michael Munger at 07:50 PM

    EconoBlogging at Ohio University

    One of the neat things at Ohio University (my undergrad alma mater) is that the winners of the university's teaching awards get to teach a class on anything they want. This term, Don Lacombe (congrats Don!) is doing a course called Econoblogging.

    Today was the first day of my new EconoBlogging course here at Ohio University. A little background to get everyone up to speed...

    I recently was awarded a University Professorship, which is a University-wide award for teaching excellence as determined by students. Every University Professor gets the opportunity to teach the "course of their dreams" and I thought a course that examined the many different economics blogs would be interesting.

    We will initially take a look at a recent book by my colleague Harold Winter entitled Trade-Offs: An Introduction to Economic Reasoning and Social Issues. This is one of the best introductions to the so-called "economic way of thinking" I have encountered and has also been favorably reviewed by bloggers.

    I also mentioned to students that one of my main fields of expertise in graduate school at Florida State University was Public Choice (click here for an accessible introduction). I studied under the fine tutelage of Randy Holcombe and Bruce Benson, so I have a fairly good understanding of the issues involved. I also happen to think that examining the political economy of issues can be illuminating in its own right.

    I hope that everyone finds the course interesting and that those of you who are not enrolled find it equally interesting as well. Comments will be open and I encourage the fruitful exchange of ideas.

    Posted by Robert Lawson at 01:51 PM in Economics

    Bosses Don't Wear Bunny Slippers

    A new essay, coming out today, on EconLib.

    Not public until noon or so today.

    But, as a special service to DoL readers....you can get it NOW!

    Don't you feel special?

    Posted by Michael Munger at 08:23 AM in Economics

    January 06, 2008
    Stunningly Ignorant

    I watched about 2 minutes of last night's commiecrat debate. It just so happened to be the 2 minutes that Bill Richardson was airing his economic ignorance for all the world to see. To wit, in response to a question about using a carbon tax to reduce global warming, Richardson stated:

    The better way to do it is through a cap-and-trade system, which is a mandate. Furthermore, a carbon tax, that's passed on to consumers. That's passed on to the average person. That's money you take out of the economy. So it's a bad idea.

    Crikey--he's so clueless he can't figure out that cap-and-trade costs might get passed along to consumers in the form of higher prices.

    Fortunately I turned the channel before Hillary Clinton responded to the carbon tax question but Mankiw describes her answer as "vacuous blather" and "magic-wand economics." I suspect those terms could describe most of both parties debates.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 01:54 PM in Economics

    Mike Lester, Sports Economist

    LesterSportsEconCartoon.jpg

    Background: Rome has been selected to host the 2008 and 2009 NAIA national championship football games. Local officials estimate a $1-1.5 million local economic impact.

    Posted by E. Frank Stephenson at 01:37 PM in Economics ~ in Sports

    January 05, 2008
    The War on Smoking c. 1908

    The Jan 5, 1908, NYT reports on a pending battle in the war on smoking, this time from Germany:

    War has been declared by the German medical authorities against the familiar apparatus in use in cigar stores all over the world for cutting off the ends of cigars. It is said to be a prolific source of disease, especially tuberculosis and other infectious maladies whose germs are transmissible.

    The danger doesn't lie in the cigars themselves, but in the habit of many smokers who insert the cigars in the little guillotine arrangement after the tobacco has already been in their mouths...

    It is proposed that the cutting machines shall either be abolished or the smokers warned of the dangers lurking therein by huge placards hung up in all the places where cigars are sold. The apparatus used in private houses and clubs is described as equally deleterious. [emphasis mine]

    It would seem that the personal cigar cutter would be a practical market solution, perhaps they weren't available at the time? Moreover, why weren't customers more demanding of their local tobacconists? I suppose there could be lack of information on the part of consumers, but are we supposed to believe that men (and women?) were generally okay with the status quo?

    Posted by Craig Depken at 11:04 PM in Culture

    Real estate bubbles c. 1908

    The Jan. 5, 1908 NYT reports on the real estate market in New York City for 1907:

    The year's developments, it is true, have not been uniformly of an encouraging character. There have been foreclosures and there probably will be more. There have been readjustments between borrowers and lenders by direct transfer, without the formality of foreclosure, and there have been a few failures, but when one stops to consider what might have been expected as the results of two years of most remarkable building activity, speculation and inflation, followed by a period of intense money stringency - when one reflects upon the possibilities of such a chain of events and then looks over the actual results the real estate community has every reason to face the future with confidence, if not with elation.
    The story goes on to describe the building activity in 1907 compared to 1906 and 1905 - it was considerably lower. The then suggests that the slowdown in construction should not be viewed as a negative pre se as the demand for new housing in New York has been slowing down over the same time period. The story then suggests that the construction of housing units will likely pick up again after the completion of a number of skyscrapers currently (in 1908) under construction; the paper suggests that once the new office buildings are completed, more firms will want to locate in New York City, which will, in turn, encourage more people to relocate in the city, at which time the construction of new residential housing will commence.

    It is not exactly the same as the national housing issues of 2007, but it seems darn close. In other words, the apocryphal predictions of a worse-than-1929-depression being just one or two quarters away would seem to overstate things. Markets are very resilient, as long as government doesn't screw things up too much, and the 2007 housing market might simply be a historical footnote in one years much as the 1907 housing crisis is today.

    Posted by Craig Depken at 09:57 PM in Economics

    The Gentle Cynic c. 1908

    From the Jan. 5, 1908 NYT:


  • We never know what we can do till we try, and then very often we are sorry we found out.
  • The bigger the fish the less necessity for lying about it.
  • A white lie is seldom as immaculate as it sounds.
  • The best time for a girl to marry is when the fellow is willing.
  • The hardest part of knowing some people is to conceal our opinion of them.
  • A diplomat is a man who doesn't say everything he thinks, or think everything he says.
  • Adam and Eve, it must be clear, had not a pedigree, and yet from all the tales we hear they had a family tree.
  • Posted by Craig Depken at 05:55 PM in Culture

    Yale c. 1908

    The January 5, 1908 NYT reports on the status at Yale:

    Official registration figures at Yale show that the university has 3,306 students this year, against 3,247 last year.

    Surprise is felt that the Academic Department shows a falling off of 36 students. There are 474 members of the faculty against 442 last year.

    The Sheffield Scientific School is the only department showing substantial gains. Its numbers have increased from 875 to 948. The Graduate Department has dropped from 260 to 257, and the Medical School from 157 to 154. The Law School has increased from 294 to 330.


    In 2006, Yale had 11,415 in total enrollment with 5,332 undergraduates.

    Wikipedia's entry on the Sheffield Scientific School

    Posted by Craig Depken at 05:48 PM in Misc.

    January 03, 2008
    Externalities of work stoppages c. 1908

    The Jan. 3, 1908 NYT reports an interesting negative exteranality arising from a work stoppage of the Bakers' Union in Chicago:

    Four men, said to be members of the Bakers' Union, have been arrested on the charge of putting acid on hundreds of loaves of bread distributed among the Jewish residents on the west side. A strike is in progress at a local bakery, and it is alleged that strike sympathizers threw acid as wel as iodoform on wagon loads of bread and rolls after they had left the bakery.

    Posted by Craig Depken at 10:07 AM in Economics

    January 02, 2008
    ASSAs

    Good luck to all readers on the economics job market this year. I hope your trip to New Orleans is a rewarding one.

    Me, I'll be presenting a paper in the economic education poster session and having the barbecued shrimp at Mr. B's. My poster session paper (and website) with Bob Lawson and Dirk Mateer was recently mentioned in the Wall Street Journal's Econ Blog under the title "Black-Scholes? Meet Black Sabbath."

    Posted by Joshua Hall at 11:25 AM in Economics

    January 01, 2008
    Stormy Weather

    Wherein John Tierney represents Al Gore as an "availability entrepreneur." Seems like a charitable term.

    [A]vailability entrepreneurs: the activists, journalists and publicity-savvy scientists who selectively monitor the globe looking for newsworthy evidence of a new form of sinfulness, burning fossil fuels.

    Posted by Wilson Mixon at 07:06 PM in Politics

    How bad a year was it?

    From The [London] Times:

    [S]hares and house prices have ended this year considerably higher than they began, despite all the horror stories.

    In America, the Dow Jones is 7 per cent higher than 12 months ago, having hit a record as recently as October 9. The FTSE 100 is up 5 per cent and Germany’s DAX has gained no less than 23 per cent and is near its all-time high, having fully recovered the losses of July and August. In Asia, stock markets are all far above levels before the credit crisis, with Hong Kong up 40 per cent on the year and Shanghai up 70 per cent. Only in Japan have asset prices substantially fallen... .

    Property markets, too, have faired much better that one might imagine, at least outside America. Last week, Nationwide said its [U. K.] house-price index fell for a second consecutive month in December and most analysts (including me) expect the market to get a lot worse. But it’s the strength, not weakness, of house prices in 2007 that is most remarkable. Nationwide’s figure is 5 per cent higher than a year ago, even after the recent falls.

    As of the end of the 3rd quarter, US house prices were up 1.79 percent from a year earlier. (Source: Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (who knew such a thing existed?)), News Release, 11/29/07.

    Posted by Wilson Mixon at 01:06 PM in Economics

    The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. -Adam Smith

    Our Bloggers
    Joshua Hall
    Robert Lawson
    E. Frank Stephenson
    Michael C. Munger
    Lawrence H. White
    Craig Depken
    Tim Shaughnessy
    Edward J. Lopez
    Brad Smith
    Mike DeBow
    Wilson Mixon
    Art Carden
    Noel Campbell

    Search

    Archives
    By Author:
    Joshua Hall
    Robert Lawson
    E. Frank Stephenson
    Michael C. Munger
    Lawrence H. White
    Edward Bierhanzl
    Craig Depken
    Ralph R. Frasca
    Tim Shaughnessy
    Edward J. Lopez
    Brad Smith
    Mike DeBow
    Wilson Mixon
    Art Carden
    Noel Campbell

    By Month:
    February 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004

    Powered by
    Movable Type 2.661

    Site design by
    Sekimori

    XML