|
November 25, 2009
Questions on The Price of Everything
My econ 101 students have to write a review of Russ Roberts's The Price of Everything this semester. Some questions corresponding to each chapter are below the fold. Comments are open for a few days if you have any suggestions; if you like any of these questions, please feel free to use them. Chapter 1 2. After the earthquake, Big Box doubled its prices. Use a supply and demand diagram to explain why the prices of diapers, flashlights, plywood, and other goods would increase after a disaster. Chapter 2 2. At the end of the chapter, Ruth Lieber asks her students to find something that exhibits order without design. Provide and explain an example of your own. Chapters 3 and 4 2. Ruth Lieber argues that “prices are key” to coherent changes in the graphite industry. How are prices “key?” 3. On an average day, most people who go to the grocery store do not worry about whether the store will be out of milk, bread, or coffee. Why not? Chapters 5 and 6 2. Suppose you own a store and there are a hundred people lined up to buy fifty flashlights. Who should get them, and why? 3. Suppose you live in an earthquake-prone region like the San Francisco Bay area. Would you be more or less willing to hold a large inventory of flashlights if you knew that you could charge high prices for them in the event of a disaster? 4. What are the key differences between the scenarios in 1 and 2? How do these differences change your answer? 5. Ramon Fernandez wants “a world where flashlights are both cheap and available! Why can’t we have both?” How would you answer him? Chapter 7 2. How much wealthier are we today than in 1900? Why? Chapters 8 and 9 2. Ruth Lieber tells Ramon Fernandez never to “confuse a person’s identity or value with her job title. They have nothing to do with each other.” Does this contradict what we have learned this semester? Explain. 3. This is a quote from Ruth Lieber on page 123: “I’m not pro-business. I’m not even pro-profits. There is nothing inherently good about high profits.” Explain. Chapters 10 through 13 2. Ruth Lieber claims that the market “deserves some romance.” Do you agree or disagree? Why or why not? 3. Ruth Lieber and Ramon Fernandez discuss the ways in which the labor market is and is not like a game of musical chairs. How is musical chairs an inappropriate description of the labor market? 4. According to Ruth Lieber, why can’t companies like Walmart choose to pay their employees more or less? Explain your answer using the tools we have developed in class. 5. How wouldn’t Ruth help the poor? Explain how some of the “solutions” she discusses might actually make them worse off. 6. Who is “the weaver of dreams?” 7. Consider the expression “people before profit.” Evaluate it in light of the lessons of The Price of Everything and the Key Elements of Economics. Posted by Art Carden at 04:48 PM in Economics
Comments
Art, Here's the 11 questions I gave mine: 1. At the end of chapter 2, Ruth insists that despite the fact that companies have bosses, “no one is in charge” and that no one sets the price of goods and services. Explain what she might mean by that and how it relates to our discussions in class. 2. In chapter 4, Ruth claims that the flock of birds as a whole is smarter than the smartest bird in the flock. What’s the equivalent claim about how markets work? Give an example. 3. At the end of chapter 4, Ruth engages the class in a discussion about “price gouging” and price controls. Use supply and demand curves to illustrate her point about gas prices after Hurricane Katrina. 4. In chapter 6 (p. 73) Ramon says “But I want a world where flashlights are both cheap and available! Why can’t we have both?...You’re the economist. Tell me why we can’t do better.” How would you answer Ramon? 5. Explain the distinction between “pro-business” and “pro-market” that Ruth invokes in chapter 9 (p. 123). Why do you think people confuse those two ideas? What do you think of Ruth’s answer to Ramon? 6. On p. 135 in chapter 10, Ruth analogizes economic evolution to biological evolution, but she’s careful to note that unlike genetic mutation, “economic evolution isn’t random.” Why isn’t it? What makes it possible for individual humans, firms, and households to engage in economic behavior that isn’t random? How is it that even as they are all very “purposeful,” the outcome of their actions reflects none of their intentions? 7. Later in chapter 10, Ruth says “As we destroy jobs, we get wealthier.” What does that mean? Give an example other than the ones Ruth provides. 8. Who or what is the “weaver of dreams?” Explain your answer. 9. What did you think of the book overall? Did you like it or not? Did it help you understand the course material? What worked and what didn’t? 10. Do you think the book was valuable enough to be required reading the next time I teach the course? Why or why not? 11. BONUS QUESTION: on p. 156, Ruth struggles with a crossword puzzle clue. What’s the right answer that she can’t get? Why is this absolutely the funniest moment in the book? This is very helpful; I am writing a syllabus for "Economics and Democratic Citizenship" for spring that will use Price of Everything. Any other book suggestions or readings? I am giving them Miller and North to do some current events already. What would you add to this? Posted by: King Banaian at November 25, 2009 08:45 PMI have used, to great effect, DiLorenzo's HOW CAPITALISM SAVED AMERICA and Russ's INVISIBLE HEART in principles classes. If anyone is interested in seeing my test questions for these books, please email me. Posted by: Chris Westley at November 25, 2009 09:43 PM |
The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. -Adam Smith
Our Bloggers
Joshua HallRobert Lawson E. Frank Stephenson Michael C. Munger Lawrence H. White Craig Depken Tim Shaughnessy Edward J. Lopez Brad Smith Mike DeBow Wilson Mixon Art Carden Noel Campbell
Blogroll
Search
Archives
By Author:
Joshua HallRobert Lawson E. Frank Stephenson Michael C. Munger Lawrence H. White Edward Bierhanzl Craig Depken Ralph R. Frasca Tim Shaughnessy Edward J. Lopez Brad Smith Mike DeBow Wilson Mixon Art Carden Noel Campbell
By Month:
February 2010January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004
Powered by
Site design by |