|
November 10, 2009
Why does socialism not make comedies?
This morning, I spent the hours between midnight and 4 AM watching "Our Man Flint" and "In Like Flint." I know James Coburn won an Oscar for "Affliction," but he deserves a lifetime achievement award for these two films alone. They are spy- and Cold War- and society-spoofs extraordinaire. They've gotten funnier through the years, if only because society has changed so much from the mid-1960s when they were filmed. But they got me thinking, where are the great comedies from National Socialism, or the Soviets, or the Cultural Revolution? Heck, where are the great comedies from Putin's Russia or Hu's New China? It seems to me that only free societies produce comedies, but I don't understand why. Noel's First Law of Film (I really, really like that phrase, BTW) states that socialist films (National flavor or Communist flavor) will skew heavily toward propaganda. This is because entertaining arts present an irresistable medium for cultural message-making, which the socialists require. A central idea behind socialism is that the members of a "class" will choose to work for the betterment of their "class." In reality, of course, this founders on the free rider problem; a situation Olson discussed in 1965. Hence the propaganda film in statist societies.... But why not use comedy to make the point? Laughing together is a pwoerful tool for building community and solidarity. This is something the U.S. socialists understood. When the U.S. was engaged in its heavy-petting flirtation with socialism in the 1930s, the comeday of Will Rogers was very valuable at building popular support for the socialists' policies, even as (or especially because) he was poking fun at those very policies! By making fun of the WPA and the CCC, Rogers engendered acceptance of these programs. So why didn't the Soviets, et al., get the memo? Perhaps I'm way off base; the Soviets and the Cultural Revolution eras produced boat-loads of comedy gold, but I simply haven't seen the movies. But somehow I doubt it. Anyway, can't you just envision a sitcom like "The Honey-Mooners" set in 1950s Leningrad? Please send your critical insights to noelecon@gmail.com Posted by Noel Campbell at 12:22 PM
|
The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. -Adam Smith
Our Bloggers
Joshua HallRobert Lawson E. Frank Stephenson Michael C. Munger Lawrence H. White Craig Depken Tim Shaughnessy Edward J. Lopez Brad Smith Mike DeBow Wilson Mixon Art Carden Noel Campbell
Blogroll
Search
Archives
By Author:
Joshua HallRobert Lawson E. Frank Stephenson Michael C. Munger Lawrence H. White Edward Bierhanzl Craig Depken Ralph R. Frasca Tim Shaughnessy Edward J. Lopez Brad Smith Mike DeBow Wilson Mixon Art Carden Noel Campbell
By Month:
February 2010January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004
Powered by
Site design by |