January 09, 2009
Who's The Top Two?

I car pool with William Keech, the political economist who used to be Head of the Decision Sciences Dept at Carnegie Mellon, and is now a Research Prof. at Duke.

In the car, we got to discussing a question he had raised in class this week: Who were (are) the TWO most important economists of the 20th century?

Where...."important" means influential, having the biggest impact on the way people think and the way government acts.

Without revealing individual viewpoints, let me say that we agreed that Maynard K has to be one of them. Right or wrong, he had a huge impact, and continues to.

But....who is second?

We came up with the following list of possibilities, listed in alpha order here.

Kenneth Arrow
Milton Friedman
Friedrich Hayek
Paul Samuelson
Joseph Schumpeter

If the criterion is practical influence, then I think the answer has to be Friedman.

But in terms of influencing my OWN thinking, and that of some others, most DEEPLY, it's Hayek.

And if it's being a Soviet-loving caricature of Smith's "Man of System," then the answer is clearly Samuelson.

(I'm going to allow comments for a bit)--Discuss

Posted by Michael Munger at 09:54 AM in Economics

Comments

Just as a POV from my seat, the individual has to be influential in providing students who make an impact in the area of economics. So for example, Keynes influenced Samuelson et al. Friedman created a whole new school of thought regarding monterism. But there are two students of Mises on that list.

For me I would have to say it's Keynes and Friedman, just because of their impact on the study of economics and it's implementation. Not that I agree with all of their ideas and how it was implemented.

My two cents for what it's worth.

Posted by: Matt C. at January 9, 2009 10:41 AM

I'm going with Hayek and Friedman.

Posted by: Milena Thomas at January 9, 2009 11:07 AM

I agree with Dr. Munger. Keynes followed by Friedman, if talking about political influence only, and Hayek in terms of thought and philosophy.

Posted by: MnM at January 9, 2009 12:18 PM

Hayek's massive influence is documented in quoted from dozens of leading economists and political theorists, etc. found here:

http://hayekcenter.gregransom.com/friedrichhayek/hayekquote.htm

Note well that few economists did more to influence the economics of Keynes than Hayek -- without Hayek's utter blowing up of Keynes' work of 1930 there would have been no _General Theory_.

Hayek's infuence on Keynes is largely untold, as far as I am aware.

Are there any good recent publications on this?

Posted by: Greg Ransom at January 9, 2009 01:35 PM

sYa4ez iioanehwvtdy, [url=http://avhlqcmfixip.com/]avhlqcmfixip[/url], [link=http://irafrqojsoov.com/]irafrqojsoov[/link], http://xmhbqhlhmttk.com/

Posted by: sfzrhdb at January 11, 2009 06:30 AM

nice!

Posted by: soittoäänet at January 13, 2009 02:27 AM

The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. -Adam Smith

Our Bloggers
Joshua Hall
Robert Lawson
E. Frank Stephenson
Michael C. Munger
Lawrence H. White
Craig Depken
Tim Shaughnessy
Edward J. Lopez
Brad Smith
Mike DeBow
Wilson Mixon
Art Carden
Noel Campbell

Blogroll

Search

Archives
By Author:
Joshua Hall
Robert Lawson
E. Frank Stephenson
Michael C. Munger
Lawrence H. White
Edward Bierhanzl
Craig Depken
Ralph R. Frasca
Tim Shaughnessy
Edward J. Lopez
Brad Smith
Mike DeBow
Wilson Mixon
Art Carden
Noel Campbell

By Month:
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004

Powered by
Movable Type 2.661

Site design by
Sekimori

XML