September 15, 2008
The financial news is bad, and so is much of the analysis

On campus this afternoon I overheard the following remark by a non-economist, trying to explain to another non-economist the Lehman failure and today's stock market decline: “It’s a combination of deregulation and greed. Boy, if you deregulate enough, the greed will follow.”

If I had butted in, I would have made two points. (1) If an unusually large number of airplanes crash during a given week, do you blame gravity? No. Greed, like gravity, is a constant. It can’t explain why the number of crashes is higher than usual. (2) What deregulation have we had in the last decade? Please tell me. On the contrary, we’ve had a strengthening of the Community Reinvestment Act, which has encouraged banks to make mortgage loans to borrowers who previously would have been rejected as non-creditworthy. And we’ve had the imposition of Basel II capital requirements, which have encouraged banks to game the accounting system through quasi-off-balance-sheet vehicles, unhelpfully reducing balance sheet transparency.

No more edifying are the statements of Noriel Roubini of NYU in a video interview that had top billing on Yahoo’s entry page this afternoon. The accompanying text story is headlined “Top Economist: Americans Should Worry About Bank Deposits if Congress Doesn't Act”.

In the interview Roubini says that “right now there is actually [a] slow-motion run on retail banks around the country”. This is both conceptually and factually wrong. A slow-motion run, where people do not roll over their time deposits, is not a run at all. It allows the bank to shrink in a more orderly fashion, without losses from overly hasty asset sales. A run is where checking account depositors seek to empty out their accounts. Neither a run nor a slower exodus from retail banks is in fact underway. Total checkable deposits (seasonally adjusted), as tracked by the St. Louis Fed’s FRED data base, are not shrinking (comparing the latest weekly observation, 2008-09-01, to three weeks, six weeks, or three months earlier).

Here is how the text story reports a subsequent Roubini claim:

That "run" could accelerate as people realize the FDIC fund has about $50 billion to "insure" about $1 trillion in assets at the nation's financial institutions, says Roubini. "They're going to run out of money" unless Congress acts soon to recapitalize the FDIC.

What the heck would it mean for Congress to “recapitalize” an institution that has $50 billion in net worth? Roubini fails to note that the FDIC already has, as was made explicit when the FDIC came close running out of funds in 1991, an unlimited line of credit from the US Treasury. If the FDIC starts running out of money, the Treasury will lend it however much more is needed to keep insured bank depositors whole. In the worst case imaginable, the Fed will print however much money the Treasury needs. (At that point we’d need to distinguish depositors’ nominal wholeness from their purchasing-power wholeness.) Failing to note the FDIC's Fed-backed credit line, Roubini's contrast between the size of the FDIC's current fund to the size of worst-case draws on the fund misleadingly exaggerates the nominal risk to depositors.

Roubini’s interviewers do not provide any balance. Instead they add to the confusion by conflating the risky liabilities of investment banks and brokerage firms (which are not runable because they are not demand-deposit liabilities) with the (runable but insured) deposit liabilities of commercial (retail) banks.

Posted by Lawrence H. White at 07:07 PM in Economics

The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. -Adam Smith

Our Bloggers
Joshua Hall
Robert Lawson
E. Frank Stephenson
Michael C. Munger
Lawrence H. White
Craig Depken
Tim Shaughnessy
Edward J. Lopez
Brad Smith
Mike DeBow
Wilson Mixon
Art Carden
Noel Campbell


By Author:
Joshua Hall
Robert Lawson
E. Frank Stephenson
Michael C. Munger
Lawrence H. White
Edward Bierhanzl
Craig Depken
Ralph R. Frasca
Tim Shaughnessy
Edward J. Lopez
Brad Smith
Mike DeBow
Wilson Mixon
Art Carden
Noel Campbell

By Month:
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004

Powered by
Movable Type 2.661

Site design by