The Norwood, Ohio takings case is in.

In the absence of other public benefit, the fact that an appropriation of property will provide an economic benefit to the community does not satisfy the public-use requirement of Section 19, Article I of the Ohio Constitution — The void-for-vagueness doctrine applies to statutes that regulate the use of eminent-domain powers — Courts shall apply heightened scrutiny when reviewing statutes that regulate the use of eminent-domain powers — The term “deteriorating area” as a standard for an appropriation of property is unconstitutional — R.C. 163.19 is unconstitutional in part.

SOURCE: Ohio Supreme Court