May 03, 2006
$100 is insulting?

I am a big fan of mailbox money, especially if the money is removed from the clutches of the Federal government, therefore when the Republican Majority Leader of the House suggests that a $100 check in my mailbox would be insulting, I beg his pardon:

Boehner told reporters Tuesday he considered the rebate "insulting" and said it would not solve motorists' problems. He said he received nothing but negative responses from constituents. "They thought it was stupid," said Boehner.
$100 is less than 2 tanks of high-test for my 1988 MB roadster, but would contribute to my next digital camera. I wonder how much more of this we need until we are all voting "L" instead of "R" and "D".

The insanity that is known as the Congressional Session gets even more bizarre as the House is evidently seriously considering an arguably hastily written federal law making price gouging illegal (more here, the 2005 bill, the 2006 bill). The story offers the following "justifications":

About half of the states have some price gouging statutes, but enforcement and penalties vary widely. There is no federal law prohibiting price gouging nor agreement among the states on what constitutes price gouging [emphasis added].

State attorneys general have lobbied for a federal price gouging law.

"Nationally there is no common definition of price gouging," Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard told a Senate hearing in November. He said some states have laws that apply only to emergencies, while others allow up to 20 percent price increases.

The House bill requires the Federal Trade Commission to establish a definition of price gouging and imposes stiff civil and criminal penalties for violators who market gasoline, diesel fuel, crude oil and heating fuel.

It seems that the worst federal laws come about when it is believed that the various states haven't homogenized their definitions/penalties sufficiently. The fact that the FTC hasn't come up with a working definition of price gouging in almost 100 years of existence doesn't seem to register with those on the Hill.

I bet my students a full letter grade that they can't find a published definition of price gouging in an economics textbook. There might be one out there, but to date I have never had to pay up.

Congress consistently passes bad legislation because (in the least) a) they think they are smarter (or more powerful) than the market, b) they subscribe to a political pragmatism that can be summed up as "any policy is better than no policy", and c) they incorrectly subscribe to a philosophy that a free society is consistent with an overarching government apparatus that will monitor the thousands of decisions of thousands of gasoline (and other) producers, retailers, and customers.

I wouldn't mind a little mailbox money - and a corresponding reduction in federal expenditures - but I have a feeling Congress is too busy being insulted for me.

Posted by Craig Depken at 11:06 AM in Economics  ·  TrackBack (0)

The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. -Adam Smith

Our Bloggers
Joshua Hall
Robert Lawson
E. Frank Stephenson
Michael C. Munger
Lawrence H. White
Craig Depken
Tim Shaughnessy
Edward J. Lopez
Brad Smith
Mike DeBow
Wilson Mixon
Art Carden
Noel Campbell


By Author:
Joshua Hall
Robert Lawson
E. Frank Stephenson
Michael C. Munger
Lawrence H. White
Edward Bierhanzl
Craig Depken
Ralph R. Frasca
Tim Shaughnessy
Edward J. Lopez
Brad Smith
Mike DeBow
Wilson Mixon
Art Carden
Noel Campbell

By Month:
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004

Powered by
Movable Type 2.661

Site design by