|
November 30, 2005
Turkey prices c. 1905
Nov. 30, 1905 was Thanksgiving. The day's NYT notes that the formal holiday of Thanksgiving was created during the Lincoln administration during the Civil War - a period during which the country had little to be thankful for. The article describes the same basic holiday we have today - food, visiting with family, watching football, playing golf, oh, and more food. There are voluntary organizations providing dinners to the poor and homeless. It is all comfortably familiar. The last paragraph, however, mentions that turkeys were selling for between 23 and 28 cents per pound and "there was no dearth of supply." I bet there wasn't. According to the folks at eh.net, $0.23 in 1905 would be: $4.77 using the Consumer Price Index The loss-leading turkeys at the grocery store during the Thanksgiving/Christmas period sell for about $0.40-$0.60 per pound, putting the nominal price of these turkeys not much higher than a hundred years ago. However, this article points out that (in 2005): Sendik's on W. Blue Mound Road in Brookfield was taking orders for Amish free-range turkeys from Wisconsin for $1.49 a pound, while Jacobson's, the butcher shop in Brennan's in Brookfield, offered free-range turkeys from northern Minnesota for $1.99 a pound.For some turkeys (or turkey-marketing techniques) the nominal price hasn't changed in a hundred years - isn't that impressive. For the high-end, fancy turkeys the real price hasn't changed in a hundred years - that, too, is impressive (perhaps moreso). If the demand for turkeys was static, this would suggest no change in the technology of raising turkeys. However, the demand for turkeys has likely increased with the increase in population, income, and the number of households with deep-friers, therefore the technology for raising turkeys must have improved and reduced real costs (even for free-range turkeys!) in order to keep real prices constant. Yet more evidence of the power of markets. Posted by Craig Depken at 12:48 PM in Economics
·
TrackBack (0)
|
The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. -Adam Smith
Our Bloggers
Joshua HallRobert Lawson E. Frank Stephenson Michael C. Munger Lawrence H. White Craig Depken Tim Shaughnessy Edward J. Lopez Brad Smith Mike DeBow Wilson Mixon Art Carden
Blogroll
Search
Archives
By Author:
Joshua HallRobert Lawson E. Frank Stephenson Michael C. Munger Lawrence H. White Edward Bierhanzl Craig Depken Ralph R. Frasca Tim Shaughnessy Edward J. Lopez Brad Smith Mike DeBow Wilson Mixon Art Carden
By Month:
October 2008September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004
Powered by
Site design by |