|
August 29, 2005
All your gold are belong to us
In April 1933, using emergency powers granted by the Congress, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued an executive order (you can see it here) commanding US citizens to surrender their gold coins and bullion to the Federal Reserve system. The Fed paid the then-official price of $20.67 in Federal Reserve notes per gold ounce. After collecting the gold, the US government devalued the dollar, declaring the gold worth $35 per ounce of gold, earning itself a tidy profit. When I talk about this episode in class, and use the word “confiscation”, some students think I must be exaggerating the imperiousness of the US government. But read on. The coins were to be melted and the gold sent to Fort Knox. Roosevelt's advisors apparently thought that the confiscation was necessary to allow the Fed to devalue the dollar against gold and thereby to allow it to re-inflate the economy – although other countries managed to devalue and inflate without confiscating gold. Did all US citizens comply with the order? Nearly. According to CNN, Only about 25 out of 445,500 [double eagles minted in 1933] are known to have survived destruction after the United States abandoned the gold standard in 1933 and ordered them melted down. The news angle here involves a few coins that escaped melting: Ten "Double Eagle" $20 coins minted in 1933 were discovered in September in a Philadelphia antiques and jewelry store and voluntarily handed by its owners, the Langbord family, to the Mint for authentication. The Langbords now say they plan to sue to get the coins back. The coins have an estimated street value, based on numismatic rarity, of $1 million each. The Mint wants to put them in its museum. CLARIFICATION: Since 1975, US citizens are again allowed to own gold coins, including pre-1933 US mintages. The 1933 mint-date double-eagles are a special case in that they were never officially issued. The Mint contends that any 1933 gold coins in private hands must have been filched. Posted by Lawrence H. White at 11:03 AM in Economics
·
TrackBack (0)
|
The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. -Adam Smith
Our Bloggers
Joshua HallRobert Lawson E. Frank Stephenson Michael C. Munger Lawrence H. White Craig Depken Tim Shaughnessy Edward J. Lopez Brad Smith Mike DeBow Wilson Mixon Art Carden
Blogroll
Search
Archives
By Author:
Joshua HallRobert Lawson E. Frank Stephenson Michael C. Munger Lawrence H. White Edward Bierhanzl Craig Depken Ralph R. Frasca Tim Shaughnessy Edward J. Lopez Brad Smith Mike DeBow Wilson Mixon Art Carden
By Month:
January 2009December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004
Powered by
Site design by |