|
August 10, 2005
Grumbling in Hollywood
Here in the States, Hollywood has been grumbling because of the flat or falling year-over-year earnings at the boxoffice. There are plenty of excuses for why people aren't going to the movies as much as they once did, including DVDs, pirating, video games, and alternative uses of scarce time. Such concerns were also voiced about television and radio. From what I have seen, not too many people have admitted that remaking Herbie, the Bad News Bears, and the Longest Yard is not likely to set everybody agog. Here's a quick and dirty picture of year-over-year percentage changes in the top 12 grossing movies domestically. Perhaps this is caused by piracy and DVDs but I bet it has much more to do with the quality of the movies relative to the quality of alternative uses of time. This story suggests that the movie industry is taking it in the shorts in Asia as well. Some blame piracy, but still others admitted two things. First, the quality of the movies is down. Second, comparing to 2004 is misleading because 2004 was a big year in the movies. What is in common between the market for movies in Asia and the U.S.? Piracy and the quality of movies. Which is more likely to be causing the dramatic drops in revenue? Stunning statistic of the day? So far this year, China's top boxoffice earner is "Sith," which by July 10 had earned 75.23 million yuan ($9.09 million) nationally. However, the current "blackout" of foreign releases through to the end of August could affect overall 2005 results.Perhaps government regulation might keep the revenue at an artificially low level, but $9 million? For the entire country?! Can anybody offer the going price in yuan for a movie in Beijing? Posted by Craig Depken at 12:37 PM in Culture
·
TrackBack (0)
Comments
|
The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. -Adam Smith
Our Bloggers
Joshua HallRobert Lawson E. Frank Stephenson Michael C. Munger Lawrence H. White Craig Depken Tim Shaughnessy Edward J. Lopez Brad Smith Mike DeBow Wilson Mixon Art Carden Noel Campbell
Blogroll
Search
Archives
By Author:
Joshua HallRobert Lawson E. Frank Stephenson Michael C. Munger Lawrence H. White Edward Bierhanzl Craig Depken Ralph R. Frasca Tim Shaughnessy Edward J. Lopez Brad Smith Mike DeBow Wilson Mixon Art Carden Noel Campbell
By Month:
July 2010June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004
Powered by
Site design by |